226

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm looking forward to Tron. I didn't see the live-in-person tweet. What was planned? And why did it fall through?

227

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm not getting emails lately, even though i've got 'subscribe to topics by default' checked in my profile. And my email address is right. It used to work fine.

edit: I got one a couple of hrs ago for the 'Release, Record: 10/23' topic but not others. Weird.

228

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://www.outsidecontext.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/writer//MagpulPTSAEGPartTwo_1364D/a_019JenetteGoldsteinTri.jpg

229

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://i53.tinypic.com/2dllu84.jpg

230

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just put out the sign and get the snowplows and Soylent Green trucks.

231

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Maybe you should do Apocalypse Now. I mean, Martin Sheen went to all this trouble.
http://i52.tinypic.com/rardy0.jpg

232

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Is it possible to embed videos? I can see how it might get annoying if people did it too often though.

And more bbcodes? I don't think we can do strikethrough, for example.

[s]And lots of boobies![/s]

233

(4 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A chart=http://i54.tinypic.com/152kq4m.jpg

Can we make suggestions? I have Ridley on the brain a little bit because of the Alien prequel, so how about favorite Ridley Scott-directed movie. Here's a budget/BO chart (missing The Duellists).

-Alien
-Blade Runner
-Thelma & Louise
-Black Rain
-Black Hawk Down
-Other

235

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'd make my way to a marina and grab the biggest yacht and travel the oceans until this ZA nonsense is over. Maybe 130ft, big enough that it has a water-maker. Enough weapons for when i have to get food and gas.

236

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

This is more about the franchise than Alien itself, i just read some good news.

What's the deal with Fox anyway? It's like they prefer to make junk like Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem instead of spending a few bucks and maybe getting something equal to the original. Why would they give Ridley a hard time? I hope they get Portman but i can't really picture her as a "female Colonial Marine general".

237

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh my.

238

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

redxavier wrote:

TRON is great just because of David Warner, who I can watch in just about anything. Hell, he makes Wing Commander worth watching. End of line.

Scary thought, we're only 9 years away from the Blade Runner version of the future.

Have you ever seen Straw Dogs? That's messed up movie.

I guess we're right on track global warming wise.

239

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Maybe Teague should let us DIFtards™ come by and record the show for Tron and Blade Runner since we have so much to say about it.

I like polls but we need better questions.

241

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

DorkmanScott wrote:

I'm very aware and appreciative that it's an important film, but like DAWN OF THE DEAD and TRON, I don't know what people are talking about when they say it's a good film.

Do people say they're good films? Some of my favorite movies are bad films. Jean 'Moebius' Giraud (who i met once) worked on Tron and said he was extremely disappointed when he saw it but some of the computer world stuff had a grandeur. That's how i feel, i tolerate the real world stuff. And i like Jeff Bridges. And Cindy Morgan was hot as fuck. And that helicopter scene at the end is the scariest thing i've ever seen.

/sleepy time

242

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Invid wrote:

For that film it would be like removing the music from a Metalica song and then asking why anyone considers Metalica to be good.

Well said. But... Metalica? I think people are just sick of hearing about how great the VFX are. (But they are.)

Zarban wrote:

The film is about mankind coming to grips with the fact that we can create something genuinely greater than ourselves—perhaps even deserving of supplanting us. Its form is a film noir—where no one is entirely innocent—which allows its hero to fail and its villain to gain redemption without destroying the story. Great, great movie.

Except for the fucking unicorn. The unicorn is evidence that Ridley Scott is some kind of retard.

The replicants aren't great, they're slaves. Creating them was evil. It's the result of a total lack of empathy.

The unicorn is cool. Ridley insisting that it means Deckard's a replicant is retarded.

2 things bug me about that movie.
1, the editing: no VO, lose old Joanna Cassidy's CG face replacement, keep Batty's "father" line, use the quicker scene at Deckard's apt at the end from the work print, and keep the happy ending.
2, the acting style: I don't know anything about acting so can't really explain it but Ford's goofy exaggerated smiles are... wrong. Hauer's theatrical evilness is just right. The love scene is wrong. Ridley's previous movie, Alien, had this weird ultra realistic acting where the actors sometimes even flubbed the dialogue on purpose and it worked perfectly. But not here. Ford's perfect when he's running around, but his acting is hardboiled and cartoony at the same time and it don't work for me. Except when he tells Rachel she's a skinjob, that's a beautiful scene.

243

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Shifty Bench wrote:

My birthday is tomorrow....nowhere near as eerie. So jealous! big_smile

You're probably younger than me, so i'm the one who's jealous. And happy birthday. smile

Zarban wrote:
beldar wrote:

Also, today's my birthday. 10/10/10. Eerie.

Are you also 10 years old? That would be eerie.

My sister turned 7 back in 7/7/77.

Did you notice it was posted at 10:10? I'm silly - er, i mean eerie.

244

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

http://i54.tinypic.com/dlj1gh.jpg

Maybe you should do Raw Deal.

245

(313 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Food!*

I never asked the next top 5. I blame vidina, but i could be wrong.

Top 5 things, that are within the realm of possibility, you'd like to see happen while watching a DIF live 'show taping'.

*see Dorkman's comment during SW:TPM

246

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Thanks, man. You're sweet.

247

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

Teague seems to be a bit harder on himself than he should be. The Fifth Element was mentioned during the Nerds in Babeland interview but i liked that one fine. Feel free to do more fan requested movies! On The Thing Trey and Dorkman picked up the slack, again a fine episode for one of my favorite movies of all time.
                                                            http://i50.tinypic.com/e5qtlx.jpg
Also, today's my birthday. 10/10/10. Eerie.

248

(1,019 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's like Apocalypse Now Redux, don't watch that version first (if ever).

249

(93 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

[nerd]The content on a DVD is encoded in a long-GOP format, so they literally cannot be jogged or shuttled the way I-frame-only digital video (or analog video, obviously) can be.[/nerd]

Oh. Well... Then what's the deal with stamps?! Your taxes pay for the post office, then you have to buy stamps, then there's sales tax on the stamps. You pay 3 times. I hate it!

wink

250

(93 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jeffery Harrell wrote:

I like Avatar

You guys just like blue boobies.

http://i51.tinypic.com/280tiep.jpg

redxavier wrote:

This movie needs to be shorter.

There's no reason to hold anything back on home video. The "never before seen footage!" thing helps sales. And this isn't Chinatown, to me the visuals are the best part of the movie. If there's cool looking stuff they cut out for time, might as well throw it back in now. It's like when Robert Wise tightened up Star Trek: TMP for the director's cut. I was like: It don't make no sense. It's already the slowest movie ever made, do you think trimming 20sec from the cloud scene will make it more appealing to civilians? Only the fans who already like it will ever watch it. Make it twice as long!

Laserdiscs used to have a thing where you could program what version of the film you wanted to see. Some chapters were only a couple of seconds long to accomplish this. Now you have to wait for them to release different versions; usually just long enough since the last version in order to get you to buy it again.

[rant]And what ever happened to the 'jog / shuttle' function on remotes? You used to be able to just flick your thumb on the spring-loaded wheel to rewind. It literally took ½ sec, now you have to press 'rew', press again to cycle through 4x etc. It's fucking retarded.[/rant]