301

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

NOBODY USES A CAR SERVICE HERE? I GOTTA HANG OUT WITH A BETTER CLASS OF FORUM USERS.

/monocle

I'm curious about the professionals' opinions about the idea of duel directors. Some have done it for a long time (the Coen brothers) even before the directors' guild allowed it officially. But is it changing Hollywood much? Is auteur theory well and truly dead?

303

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I travel a great deal and have mostly hated taking taxis. Jersey (where I'm working now) is notorious for dirty, decrepit taxis and drivers who rip you off and/or try to get you to pay cash so they can avoid taxes.

But Uber has changed all that. I was clued in to by (Community creator/producer) Dan Harmon's mentions on Twitter, and I've had nothing but fantastic experiences. The payment method is set up beforehand in the app you use to call for a car, so there's nothing even to sign. The driver and passenger rate each other after every ride, and you can not only follow the route on your phone but review it later on the Uber website (and request a fare review, if the route was inefficient). And when your request is accepted, you see the driver's name and face and car model.

Uber, Lyft, and other new app-enabled car services are controversial in some cities, and I'd like to hear if anyone else has experience with them. I feel like the taxi industry has become corrupt and lazy, and if new tech-savvy services can upset the apple cart, then so be it.

304

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm sure it made for a very interesting shot.

305

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Trey wrote:

Yeah, it was interesting to read a review of Untouchables that didn't mention the obvious Potemkin homage.

I watched Battleship Potemkin for the first time recently and didn't see the big deal. They're not THAT similar (baby carriage rolling down steps as the result of a military massacre of fleeing citizens). I guess some people think "that film makes a statement, so De Palma must be copying it to make a similar statement." But he's really just copying it because it's a great shot.

De Palma bothers me more when he apes Hitchcock very self-consciously, which is often (altho not always badly).

Darth Praxus wrote:

I'm still scrambling to catch up with all the films on the "required-to-watch" list, hence my ignorance. Shall have to add that one to the pile. smile

Now that I've seen it, i'm glad i didn't go out of my way to catch up with it. YMMV.

306

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

James Arness was in Them!, tho. He was Peter Graves' brother.

So that would totally count if you were playing horseshoes.

307

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

Oblivion ends with the hot woman being greeted by a Tom Cruise she hasn't met before, after the previous Tom Cruise made the ultimate sacrifice by suicide-bombing the boss alien.
Edge of Tomorrow: ditto

That's an interesting observation. I think Cruise is trying to think on a hero's-journey scale lately. And his pet ideas are about a man-and-woman team and self-sacrifice, which got him interested at a second go at those themes.

On the other hand, I think a lot of very good film makers do variations on a theme. Wes Anderson, Tim Burton, Christopher Nolan, and Alfred Hitchcock films are very often more like their sibling films than these two examples.

EDIT: Or you could figure that TC is advertising for another wife with the message "you and I are a great team; you just don't know it yet."

308

(40 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I had a good time. Enjoyed the humor and action and lack of fridge logic in ways that push it over Oblivion despite the production design (that tech looked gorgeous; these suits looked really clunky).

It amazes me the way Cruise consistently finds interesting properties where he can play charming but utterly soulless characters. Cage has an enormous arc and yet still hardly seems human in the end.

The only real logical problem I had was the initial setup. The British general just randomly fucks with this American PR officer who is on TV all the time for no apparent reason. The mechanics of a front-line general getting this foreign guy reassigned without his knowledge was nonsensical.

Also Cage wouldn't blackmail him; he'd just go make some phone calls and get strings pulled. You don't get to be the military's spokesman without making friends in high places. And also none of the soldiers later recognize him from the news; that's strange.

By the way, if you're looking for sources that inspired this, see James Garner in The Americanization of Emily. He's the aide of an admiral who has a nervous breakdown and orders him to get a camera and shoot the D-Day invasion to catch the first death on film, only he's a coward and a playboy.

There's no denying that her films were financially unsuccessful, and the names she names were financially successful. The exact numbers don't matter. His point remains valid.

And again, he points out that he shares the emotional reaction to the situation.

Wow. That is an unfair reading. He was talking about his emotions, not hers. And the soccer analogy is the heart of her argument. She wants to be picked to helm a big movie, but these these white guys keep getting picked. His point is that those white guys had much the same chance as she did but proved out the gate that they could make money, and she had flops.

Not sure what you mean. His point is that virtually all directors start small and then fail or thrive on their ability to turn a profit. Do we know of black, Asian, or female directors who hit big but weren't given another chance? Or who weren't given a second chance after a modest failure?

I think the problem is more basic: black, Asian, and female directors aren't even getting into the game in the first place because they lack many of the resources young, white men have. If Sundance and others had a lot of diversity but only the white male film makers were getting deals to move into major features, then that would be really telling, but I don't think that's the case.

Master Zangstromp is the quadcopter guy. ZAP!!

[video (unkown provider)]

313

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Welcome, Zak! Keep us apprised of your podcast progress, or "prodcrest".

Reading books about film making by Bogdonavitch and Ebert and others has been more instructive than reading Cinefex, tho. And listening to the director's commentary on the movie is better still. Here and there you get bits of film making philosophy dropped into the "it was so cold that day" stories.

I used to buy it from time to time as a layman with no intention of joining the VFX world, and it reads fine. I stopped looking for it (it was hard to find on bookstore shelves) when CGI became so ubiquitous that it became the answer to every "how'd they do that?" question.

I've since subscribed on the iPad and browse issues. Technology has advanced so much that Hollywood is now able to do (a bit) more practical effects and just enhance them/hide the seams with CGI.

I didn't mind Last Stand, but I hated First Class with great ferocity. I honestly can't fathom why people like it or Jennifer "I'm Unfamiliar With Your Hyoo-man Facial Expressions" Lawrence.

317

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

avatar wrote:

Or if Senator Organa says, at the end of Revenge of the Sith, that he always wanted a son. Then Luke would be the snarky Prince, and Leia would be the naive farm girl staring longingly at the binary sunset.

This is why I love Milla Jovovich. She's not good at picking scripts, so her movies are very hit-and-miss, but I dearly love that she can play that girl who turns out to be tough as nails. I wish she'd fall in with Spielberg, Abrams, Scorsese, and those guys, but I fear they wouldn't know how to direct her.

(Hint: treat her like Schwarzenegger. Do as much as you can with looks, and limit her dialog and let her actions speak her emotions.)

318

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There used to be a lot of shop-girl romance movies (women who marry the boss). TV really started shifting that in 80s, with Who's the Boss? flipping it to a shop-boy (if you will) and Moonlighting and Remington Steele making the woman the brains. But you still had Scarecrow and Mrs. King and The Nanny. And teen romances often had the girl aspiring upwards: 16 Candles, My Chauffeur, etc. Love Actually had a couple of shop-girl romances. You've Got Mail's lowly bookshop owner falls for a rich bookshop mogul. Then there's Maid in Manhattan, Two Weeks Notice, Pride & Prejudice.... But they're certainly less frequent.

Most Disney princesses start at the top instead of marrying into it, but they used to marry princes of equal station and now often fall for commoners. The recent exceptions are Beauty and the Beast, Mulan*, and The Frog Princess, all commoners who marry up.

* I know Mulan is a peasant who marries a general, so she's not a princess, but tell that to Disney.

Fun idea. Something feels wrong with the way the choral backing is done, but I'm not smart enough to know what.

Lyrically, the song's central gag doesn't build to anything, like a moment of doubt that reverses itself or the revelation of a method to the madness or something.

320

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, there's some software I've heard of that can somehow pull audio from two different USB mikes. I don't have a second USB mike or I would have tried it.

EDIT: By the way, to return to your original question, I've been looking at the Rode Podcaster, which YouTube reviews suggest has pretty much all the advantages of the Heil PR-40 at 2/3 the cost and with a USB connection (the Rode Procaster is the XLR version). These are all dynamic mikes rather than condensers like the Snowball and my Samson C03U, so they don't pick up room noise or people on other mikes.

I have a very inexpensive ($18 back in 2008) boom arm stand for my mike that I'm really happy with, so don't think you have to pay a lot for that. I agree that it's waaay more convenient than a desk stand. And I wouldn't bother with a shock mount. Anyone with a decent setup and an ounce of somatic feedback can avoid bumping the mike. Also, I use a foam ball-type windscreen and immediately ditched the clumsy goose-necked pop filter I'd bought. (However, you have to speak directly into a dynamic mike, so a stand-out pop filter might be a little more effective than the foam ball.)

BigDamnArtist wrote:

TEAGUE, look at what you're doing to Zarban!! He's starting to care about Bieber news!!

Starting??

/belieberforeber
//justin delivers

http://hollywoodlife.com/2014/05/26/jus … ena-gomez/

323

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I've toyed with the idea of moving to a little Berenger mixer and XLR mikes, but I don't think you get much of a quality boost until you add an in-line compressor-limiter. You mainly get flexibility to expand your mikes and other inputs (phone, instruments, etc.).

Of course, if that's what you're looking for, then I suggest googling "podcasting equipment" and seeing what Podcast Answer Man and others have to say about various boards.

Jimmy B wrote:

Personally I'd say casting Paul Rudd was a problem, seems like a comedy film more than anything. However, Disney signed off on Rudd as the star so it clearly wasn't that.

Also, Disney clearly know what they are doing. They are all about taking risks with directors (the two guys who made Captain America 2 were sitcom directors, for crying out loud) so if they wanted to re-write the script (as rumoured HERE) then they had a reason. Like them or not, the Marvel films have been successful and I think most of them are really good fun so if they felt that this was the way forward, then who am I to argue? As alluded to earlier, Ant Man was dead to me as soon as they cast Paul Rudd anyway.

I like Paul Rudd a lot. He's got the chops to pull off a role like that. Comic actors (as oposed to comedians) are usually better actors overall anyway.

325

(10 replies, posted in Creations)

Nice effect. I don't think I would have questioned it if you hadn't called attention to it.

re: Fedora Show
http://x1.fjcdn.com/comments/4999640+_9033356360fa7b57cce467c7b5bcd176.jpg