I once read an essay (years ago, so no hope of naming the author, sorry) that suggested the true difference between conservative and liberal worldviews is that liberals believe everyone should be happy, and conservatives believe everyone should have the opportunity to be happy.

PJ O'Rourke actually expressed the same idea in a different way when he said conservatives believe in God and liberals believe in Santa Claus.  (Not necessarily literally in either case, but as ideals.)

Of course nothing in life meets such a binary definition, but I often find that political arguments really can be boiled down to one side wanting to give X to everyone and the other wanting to make X available to the people who deserve it.

But since we can't give everything to everyone, we're stuck with defining who "deserves" X over and over again.  And that causes all the trouble.  smile

402

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

That's the problem with the entire movie, really...   

"What would be a really cool magic trick?"
"Girl floats over audience in a soap bubble!"
"Is that even remotely plausible in the real world?"
"Oh, hell no."
"Then let's do that!"

[repeat until budget is spent]

403

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

In the one-person / one shot FX production model (basically TV or low-budget model), the box analogy works fine.   Truly, adding a second day on the afternoon of the first day accomplishes little.

But the analogy doesn't scale up to the feature factory world, or to adding a second year to the first year.

In feature production (at least in Star Wars scale productions) nobody's building boxes - everybody's sanding their corner of the piece of wood that comes thru the slot every morning, and then passing it down the assembly line.   The "box" was designed long before you got your hands on it.   One year or two, doesn't matter.  You just sand the parts until the boss says to stop.   

Adding time is no biggie in this scenario (assuming the pay also scales proportionately o'course). 

Now you can sand your pieces of wood a little more carefully, or go home a little earlier...or keep working like a fiend because the total box order has been doubled along with the time.   But that's really all that will change.

404

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yep.  I was hoping for a fun romp about what stage magicians can (and can't) do.  I was disappointed.  Repeatedly.

To recycle Mike's comment about Prometheus (I think?): if a movie about football got everything as wrong as this movie does about stage magic, "football" would be played on skates with bats.

PS And I didn't think the ending could possibly disappoint me even further... but it did.  Kind of an achievement, that.

405

(55 replies, posted in Creations)

Dave wrote:

Does Vimeo have the same "naughty naughty!" algorithm?

No.  They respond to manual takedown requests, but they don't have a sniffer robot that looks for copyright violations like YouTube does.

There's no particular reason why I know this.  What?  Hmm?  I'm hanging up!  Prank caller!

406

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Ohhh, that movie.  Five minutes in, I was already hating it so hard.

http://www.lotustalk.com/forums/attachments/f68/90005d1220492322-costco-needs-bring-back-big-bags-popcorn-popcorn_10000.jpg

408

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Not having the budget for horses becomes several minutes of material, and even a major plot point later...

Ridley Scott fits that description as well.  And Spielberg, for that matter.   I can't think of anyone whose career spans decades and dozens of films that doesn't have a few clunkers in their timeline.   

Of course, if you're successful enough to have a career that lasts for decades, you also get to do the occasional vanity project and/or experiment that isn't necessarily supposed to be a blockbuster.  (See also:  Soderburgh)

410

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Tomahawk wrote:

I'm gonna go ahead and congratulate Spiff. Dude gets no love these days.

Clearly he gets some occasionally.

/obligatory

Yeah, definitely a high water mark.

And Ceremony!

Was it Batman Returns where Mike admitted he'd do Michelle Pfeiffer if it was the only way to get back to his own time?   I think that's one of my all-time faves.

TO SPORK YOU LISTEN

ohhhhh, right.  The Thai hooker with Down's Syndrome, according to Cloe's description.   Good times.

Usually a quote seems at least sorta familiar, but that one I have no memory of at all...

Sounds like an opportunity for a secondary donation scheme, like pledging when people run marathons and stuff.  For every contiguous hour Mike stays at his post, you pledge x dollars...

417

(93 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sam F wrote:

#WhatAreYouDoingMalaria

I believe the proper title is Tyler Perry's What Are You Doing, Malaria?

I will continue to leave that to others.

They accept them, they just don't do anything with them except inform the sender that cable isn't their jurisdiction.

421

(42 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Grapes of Wrath

*drops the mic*

422

(45 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

Can't wait for the sequel!

423

(12 replies, posted in Episodes)

Surprised, I guess?

In retrospect I should have given more weight to the Academy's tendency to reward movies that say "movies are great". 

*ahem* The Artist *ahem*

The Bechdel test is like taking a patient's temperature - an easy check to see if there might be a problem.  And just like a slightly high temperature, "failing" the Bechdel test doesn't automatically mean there IS a problem.

For example Gravity "fails" the Bechdel test, but for valid story reasons.  There's only one woman in the movie, which can suggest sexism - so many movies are about boys doing stuff with one girl thrown in as a love interest.  But in this case there are only two people IN the movie.  So I think Gravity gets a pass, despite "failing" the test.   Pretty sure Shawshank Redemption "fails" as well, but again that's not due to sexism.

The purpose of the Bechdel test is to raise awareness of how shockingly few movies there are with more than one major female character.   And how few of those movies develop the female characters as individuals with thoughts and goals beyond getting with the hero.

425

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Then my work here is done.

* Punches fist in the air* 
* Freeze frame*
* Don't You Forget About Me begins to play*
* Credits *