Fine, I watched the damned thing. I figured I would not be able to escape it anyway, unless I disconnected from the Internet for a year.

And shit, I'm excited. It's a teaser, so there's not enough material to say a definite "This is gonna rock" or "This is gonna suck". But in the mean time... NEW STAR WARS PICTURES! WITH VFX AND STUFF! The CG Millenium Falcon gave me goosebumps. And the X-Wings flying over the water scene looked insane.

Jacob H wrote:
C-Spin wrote:

I'm crotchety guy who's not really super excited for more Star Wars in the first place, though I was hoping to be won over by the trailer. It was decent, but honestly my biggest disappointment with it is J.J. Abrams. The Star Wars episodes all have a very restrained, composed camera aesthetic that I was hoping Abrams would remain true to. Instead he's just doing his frenetic thing and as a result it doesn't really LOOK like Star Wars to me.

Ill take that over the staginess of the prequels any day really.

I fully agree with this. I like the restrained aesthetic C-Spin is talking about in SW, but yeah, let's see what JJ can do. The stormtrooper part felt surreal, I want to see more of it.

Holy shit, you guys, there's a new Star Wars coming.

402

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Your mom's a moisture vaporator.

403

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

Your voice is honey to my ears. You're rocking this, man.

404

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah. I think I'm gonna read the books.

405

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

What do you mean?

406

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

http://i.imgur.com/vZh7ajKl.jpg

...I don't know. It's filled with cool references, an amazing cast, and other great things, but the really slow pacing had me almost dozing. The ending felt very weak, too. Probably one of those movies that should have been cult to me, but I watched it years too late. Maybe I'll give it another try someday. I had quite a few good laughs, but I didn't end up really liking it.

Gotta love chronically depressed Alan Rickman robot, though.

407

(248 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I heartily approve of this.

408

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

There's a special place in hell for people who do this kind of stuff with their pets. I don't care how much Grumpy Cat's owner says she takes special care of her. It's an animal, goddamit. Not an art piece.

409

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

You guys know about Perturbator? You better.

I love the hell out of this retro genre. The whole album Dangerous Days is amazing. It makes me think I'm in some dystopian retro cyberpunk universe with inspirations from Blade Runner, Terminator and all the other best 80s movies.

Dude even scored one of the movies from my school, which is basically a tribute to the same genre.

410

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Squiggly_P wrote:

Do you know why they animated the Watchers at 12 fps? I wasn't sure if they weren't actually stop-motion at first. They're clearly going for that look. It felt... 80's. I liked how it looked.

I don't know if there was a specific reason, but I assume they went for that look to better convey their stiffness. After all,

  Show
they're angels imprisoned in bodies of rock. Moving must not be easy (which is the point).

http://i.imgur.com/Lv0NSnX.gif

412

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

...New Zealand knows its shit.

413

(87 replies, posted in Off Topic)

140 up-close photos of ship and vehicle models constructed by ILM for the Original Star Wars Trilogy (1977-1983)

This is my kind of porn. Damn.

414

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

A'ight, peeps, convince me I should watch this episode.

415

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Isaac wrote:

I'm not trying to make any of you like this episode, but it would be nice if anyone would grant me that given how many people  are convinced they saw something great, maybe there is something to our point of view.

There is something to your point of view: the ideas behind the episode's story are great. The episode itself is absolute garbage.

Isaac wrote:

Can we agree that it is possible for something to be great even if it doesn't work for ourselves at all?

My answer is yes, absolutely. I know of movies, books, TV shows I can say are great but are just not to my taste. I have no problem with this idea; we all have different opinions and preferences. But if you're asking me "Is Kill the Moon great but just does not work for you?", my answer is no. Something I should have mentioned earlier is that the bad science surrounding the story is far from being the only thing that made me angry about this episode.

Absolutely everything made me angry.

As said earlier, the characters made me angry. Clara and the Doctor are inconsistent in themselves and thus inconsistent in their relationship (and I'm talking here about the entire season, not just Kill the Moon). Clara should be a response to Capaldi's Doctor being a prick. But is he a prick? Sometimes he is, sometimes he's not. I have no idea who this Doctor is. I perfectly know who Eccleston, Tennant and Smith were. I loved them for being so well defined, and so different between themselves. Capaldi's has no particular personality. I want to say he's a grumpy old man (which would be perfect with Capaldi, and the Doctor feeling old after Smith an interesting theme), but when I think about him, it's just not the way I feel. At times he's the grumpy old man, at times he's the crazy time traveler alien, at times he's something else. He's too random. As BDA said, he's what the episode needs him to be. It should be the opposite. And it's the same with Clara. Is she a strong-willed woman who can be the perfect response to the grumpy old Doctor? Not really. Sometimes. Not always. I am perfectly aware that human personalities are complicated and multi-layered, but I look at Clara and see someone different every sequence. Her story with the Doctor is forgotten completely, for the benefit of Pink who we still don't care about after seven episodes. She's so random that Jenna-Louise Coleman's acting only angers me (which it shouldn't; I think she's formidable, and Capaldi too).

And of course, we have the supporting characters, Lundvik and her team... who are complete morons. Moronic astronauts, yes, of course. Please don't ask me to explain why it makes me want to pluck someone's eyes out. Lundvik herself is completely bland. I don't know the actress and I don't want to be a jerk, but unless she was specifically instructed to be so boring people will actually start to fast-forward her every line, there's a problem.

Let's not forget Courtney, who apparently has no issue whatsoever processing the TARDIS, the Doctor and all the space-time thing. Because we have seen it before DOES NOT mean you can dismiss it completely, Moffat. Make your characters believable, for God's sake. Especially children. Oh, and the "Do you really think I'm not special" thing? I almost stopped the episode there (at 2', which could have set some sort of record). And of course we have oversized spiders which don't really seem to freak her out more than regular spiders.

Let's talk some more about the bad science, too. Doctor Who has a habit of showing me crazy things from the future and other civilizations and feed me technobabble until I accept it. Here we spend the whole episode be showed things from our present world we know and understand and have them do stupid things. It cannot be technobabbled. Doc Sub said none of this is real... but in that case, it is. Because the average viewer might not know much about these things doesn't mean you can go bananas with them. The power grid moment was downright idiotic. The idea driving it could have been interesting, but even in a fairy tale I wouldn't buy this.

Last but not least, the visuals. This episode looked especially bad. I'm not asking much, but please, someone explain to the VFX guys that the Earth and the Moon ARE LIT BY THE SAME FUCKING THING.

http://i.imgur.com/xenfi1sl.jpg

Owen is right, I reached the boiling point. But this episode worked really hard for it. Robots of Sherwood wasn't great, but the dialogues and setting saved it for me, which it didn't for BDA. There's not a single part of Kill the Moon I would salvage.

Either Moffat and his writer are lazy, or they're actually making a strong choice and completely failing at it. There's no silver lining here. I can't forgive something this insulting.

416

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think the main problem comes from the fact that you believe this:

Isaac wrote:

But if someone makes strong difficult choices and creates a polarizing work that some of the audience loves and some of the audience hates, then how can that work not be said to be great?

While I (and probably most of us here) think this is just laziness. I really, really do not believe for a minute that the writer made strong difficult choices. It's the opposite. To me, the bad science and inconsistent characters are only the result of going for the easy choices, and the fact that, as you said, many other people liked the episode is to me what proves there is a basis for a great story, and it might just be enough for them. I am not judging them or you - this forum being one of the last places on the Internet where discussions don't end with "No, your opinion is wrong", but I really can't look at this episode and feel anything other than shame, because it's not polarizing work; it's only incompetence.

417

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ah. Um.

Well... Um, no.

So... Nah.

Yeah, I'll just let everyone else speak.

I'm done.

418

(248 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I still can't get my head around this. As bullet3 said, it was completely random and so goddamn unfair. Again, I don't know Mike personally, but what I know is that I was amazed at him getting in such good shape in the past few months. He must have worked a lot for it, and this event seems to deny it. It's heartbreaking.

I'm just venting, but I need to. I've thought about it almost constantly today, which is amazing because I don't even know him. I can think of many people in this community and podcast that would have the same effect on me.

419

(248 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I always want to come up with clever words in such times, but the only thing there is to say is that my thoughts go not only to Mike and his family but to you guys as well. Although I don't know Mike personally, I'm in shock. I can only try and imagine what it must be for his close friends.

Stay strong, and know that we're all here for you guys. Hope he pulls through.

420

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It seems to me that whatever happens on screen can't get me excited this season. The only thing I retain from The Caretaker was Clara's character being all over the place and silly, unrealistic interactions. The pacing was better, but the plot wasn't even that interesting.

Am I growing tired of Doctor Who? Or is there indeed something really wrong with series 8? Even the Doctor doesn't feel right. Capaldi's capability is there, I can feel it, but the script is forbidding it to show. This is frustrating.

421

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nuke is the reason. Nuke is the why.

422

(3 replies, posted in Movie Stuff)

I finally saw Noah and I was very pleasantly surprised by it. I'm not allergic to religious themes as most atheists are (well, at least that's my guess), but I think I was expecting the whole movie to be what its first 30 minutes were. I kept telling myself that it would only be one of those movies I can use for visual references (kinda like Prometheus, which sometimes reminds me how much a movie can appeal to you with its visuals and still make you hate its guts).

Yet the movie slowly revealed its much more psychological side, getting away from a strictly religious viewpoint and inviting me to consider the human aspects of it all, which Doc Sub has already described much better than I possibly could. That led to a very interesting second half of the movie which actually emotionally hooked me. Russell Crowe's brilliant acting made it memorable, but the real praise has to go to Emma Watson, who revealed her potential in such a serious role.

The movie is beautiful, too. Icelandic landscapes? Couldn't ask for more. The CG is most of the time very easy to spot, but is on par with the surreal look the movie has.

Aronofsky told me a Biblical story, and I rather loved it. Way to go, Darren.

423

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

More Walking Dead from the Bad Lip Reading guys. Dammit, they're awesome.

424

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Four formers students from my school (one of which is our FX teacher) won the Masters of CG 2014 contest. They made this in under 3 months, only in their spare time. Damn.

425

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

What techniques did you use? Because I swear, if you tell me you painted all this from scratch, I'll end your life.

(or mine, more like)