751

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Short Term 12

I avoided this movie for a couple years, despite being told to watch it, because for some reason [the poster] it seemed likely to be a little think-piece-y indie sci-fi movie — a la Primer, maybe — and I'd just never be in the mood to watch a movie like that when I'd come across it again on Netflix, so "maybe later" it stayed.

Anyway. Total recommend, outstanding movie. (And for the record, it's not a sci-fi movie at all.)

*nodding slowly*

We need to start a band.

Lucas is a highly unreasonable party himself

Huh. Never thought about it that way.

754

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Huh. I haven't even heard of this movie.

755

(92 replies, posted in Creations)

I like the name.

756

(54 replies, posted in Episodes)

I am deeply curious to try this.

757

(4 replies, posted in Creations)

Bumpings are good.

758

(114 replies, posted in Creations)

Is slick.

759

(92 replies, posted in Creations)

Fine.


Fine, world.


Fine.

This tone is not present in the post itself, but it's just really fun for me to imagine Boter doing this in front of a giant flag like Patton.

761

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

DarthPraxus wrote:

Whereas every single one of his other films is shot in that ugly, flat 80s lighting style and looks like every other movie from that decade, and has Carpenter plinking away at his synthesizer trying to whallop tension into you instead of letting it leak in organically.

clap

762

(92 replies, posted in Creations)

Awwwwww, SLC Punk. I remember SLC Punk. Thanks for the organized linkage.

763

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Huh. I could see that working.

764

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Moderate to Wank will be my seventh album.

765

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

So far in my Carpenter career, my opinion matches yours.

766

(92 replies, posted in Creations)

Iiiiiiiiiinteresting. Never heard of it.

I'm no expert, but I don't think it's likely to change any time soon.

I'm also fairly unimpressed by the world's reaction to La La Land, for what it's worth. Fourteen is insane.

768

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm glad we did this movie. Thanks for the recommendation, Eddie.

*checks watch*

What, too soon?

769

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Boter wrote:

Interesting. I could see that being done well but it'd have to be with a very delicate touch. Sounds like they had meant well but didn't quite have the finesse to pull it off?

It was a pretty shitty (farcical, tonally insane) script. I'm not sure how good Jerry Lewis can be, but he wasn't good enough to pull this off. No one would have been, though — the circumstances of how he ends up in the camp in the first place are deeply hackneyed and melodramatic. It's just shitty.

Interestingly, the stuff at the camp — interacting with people on location — is actually... you know, he's Jerry Lewis, he's empathetic and funny, so that stuff largely works on a scene-to-scene basis. The machinations of the plot are pretty heinous, though.

770

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The Day the Clown Cried

This is the Jerry-Lewis-is-a-clown-at-Auschwitz movie of legend, you might have heard the story: couldn't pass the laugh test, Lewis tried hard to bury it (succeeded for the most part) but recently someone's pieced together a thirty-minute or so version from random available clips. Stuff that was shown as promotional material in the '70s on various TV shows around the world, some re-enactments from the original actors, even a few places where the shot you're watching is actually taken from behind-the-scenes footage of an editor who's watching playback of that shot, etc.. It's assembled from scraps, it's entirely in German, the version I watched had sporadic subtitles, and it's at most a third of the actual movie... but it's enough to get a sense of the thing.

I dunno, maybe I was over-prepared to cringe, but this wasn't nearly as offensive as I was expecting. I mean, yes — Jerry Lewis plays a down-on-his-luck clown who crosses the wrong guy and gets sent to a camp for political prisoners, adjacent to a concentration area for jews, where he takes to doing impromptu juggling/tumbling shows for the kids next door until the guards come down hard on him for fraternizing with 'em. Spoiler alert, if you care: he eventually is given an ultimatum by which he can either A) help the guards lead the kids into the gas chamber and then leave, or B) not help the guards and join them in the gas chamber. He seems to submit to the ultimatum at first, but once he's led them to the gas chamber, a little girl gives him "aren't you coming with us?" eyes and he decides to go in with them. Door closes, roll credits.

(In this version, at least.)

Here's where the major distinction lies, and my whole read of the movie is centered on it, so if I'm mistaken with this then my whole read is wrong: I'm pretty sure this isn't a comedy and wasn't conceived of as one. If you say "and the whole thing is played for laughs!," then of course it sounds grotesque, but... to me, this simply reads like bad taste — like the proverbial "going full retard" — not grotesquery. It's not a holocaust exploitation comedy, in other words; it plays like Lewis just wanted play a tricky dramatic role that needed to be played by a comedian ('cuz clown) in what's actually a "serious" movie, meant to ask questions about moral quandary and whatnot, and it just fell flat.

I mean, they buried it for a reason, it is pretty fucking horrifying. But it's not evil or bewildering; it's mostly just a poorly-written misfire. The hype I've heard from the likes of Patton Oswalt and Harry Shearer seemed completely alien to what I saw; I'm not sure if they were drawing from a different sample, or were more just... you know, excited to tell a weird Hollywood story that most people wouldn't have an opportunity to investigate for themselves, and they got carried away with the superlatives.

In any case, let mine be another opinion you've heard: this isn't salacious enough to care about.

(Hat tip to Seth Brower.)

771

(92 replies, posted in Creations)

Huh. Never heard of this.

772

(71 replies, posted in Creations)

Alrighty, just made it through it — the cast and world stuff helped a lot, so thanks for that.

Damn, man. This is just absolutely impressive as fuck. Well done. I'll need to turn it over in my mind some more, and there might be some dialogue bits I'd have an opinion about if I went back through it again, but generally... just, bravo. This is really amazing. I'm all in; for voice stuff, sound editing stuff, music, whatever you wanna do — I'm happy to do a buttload of work on this thing.

Might do some concept art in the meantime. tongue

773

(71 replies, posted in Creations)

https://media.giphy.com/media/j5QcmXoFWl4Q0/giphy.gif

774

(71 replies, posted in Creations)

I got four episodes in before I needed to stop.

I'll start over and try to come at it with fresh eyes, but before I do that: can I please have a breakdown of who these characters are, what their genders are, what their ranks are, and how they relate to each other? That sort of thing is often included in a big complex script like this, and those details are generally re-enforced by direction within the script throughout; here, I just kept reading while being confused. I didn't quite realize how big/long/complex this project was going to be — full disclosure, in my head it was "just" gonna be a one-off radio special — so when I discovered there was a part two, I figured it was the second half. Then when I found out there was a part three, I figured it was the third act. Then when I found out there was a part four, I became suspicious that there were just going to keep being more episodes, and at the end of part four I started skipping ahead to see how long this story actually was, and by that point I realized I was only halfway through it but maintaining no clear sense of who these people were. (A state of not-quite-cleardom that I only rolled with because I kept thinking the story was almost over.)

I'm not gonna jot down any actual review-y thoughts yet, because I'm not sure how much of this I've been interpreting correctly — for instance, I started writing this post when I realized I actually had something wrong that I had previously fixed because I had previously had it wrong too, so for all we know I might be reading a completely different story in my head — but, just so you know where I'm at generally, this shit is definitely exciting and impressive, and I'm excited to be a part of it.

775

(50 replies, posted in Episodes)

Damn, that would otherwise get an applause gif, but I just used two on Prax.  hmm