1,026

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ya, I forgot to mention it, but I thought that the whole idea of an Asylum full of crazy and dangerous Daleks was actually really cool, but totally wasted in execution.

Still, next week looks like it could be really awesome.

1,027

(77 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I gotta say it, while Season 5 has been my favorite up until this point, I thought this final cliffhanger episode in particular was super inconsistent and disappointing. Lots of character motivations that don't make sense, and suddenly the show is using time-lapse like crazy and jumping super quickly through pretty important details.

SPOILER Show
So Lydia, who has been paranoid as hell, near nervous breakdown, and begging to leave the business, is suddenly a criminal mastermind who wants to expand operations like crazy despite her company being under investigation? Bullshit. Then Walter, finally decides to get out of the business, despite being megamaniacal and not caring about the money earlier. Ok, I'll give them that one, but you're telling me that A. he's able to just stop cooking without any repercussions from the massive enterprise he just set up? I'm sure they'll get into it more next year, but not even having a scene of him telling Lydia and Todd that he's out seems like pretty important details. And B. Skylar just takes him back, like nothing's happened? She's been shown to be near suicidal and wanting him dead, but the second he says "I'm out",  it's all water under the bridge? Don't buy it.

And I'm really not digging the way the big reveal happens at the end. I'd kind of hoped that Hank would start to put the pieces together through his own detective skills. Having it be just this random object that was barely even setup earlier seems kinda lazy and short-hand to me, although I get what they're going for.

1,028

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I thought it was pretty good. Being one of the newer converts to the series, I think I just don't like Dalek episodes in general. They're such a lame and un-intimidating enemy that the whole thing comes off unintentionally hilarious.

SPOILER Show
I also gotta say that if the guest character from this opener goes on to become the new companion, I have reservations. She's way too precocious and witty. Zoey Deschanel is already pushing the whole quirk factor to the very edge of where it stops being endearing, and this chick is like 3 Zoey Deschanels.

1,029

(38 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Teague, if you want a thrilling hacker culture non-fiction book, I highly, highly recommend Underground:
http://suelette.home.xs4all.nl/undergro … ground.pdf

Julian Assange is lead researcher on the nonfiction book, which basically chronicles the early days of underground hacker culture in the late 80s, and quickly spirals into a paranoia/conspiracy thriller with
basically young hacker kids stumbling on top-secret government plans, as well as millions of dollars in
debit card accounts and going on the run from the police, feds, and beyond.

The story is absolutely nuts and some of the most engrossing non-fiction I've ever read. I recommend jumping to chapter 3 if you want to get to the coolest stuff, though it can be a bit overwhelming.

1,030

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I vote against that, there's way too many general film news sites already that just repost the exact same stories. The vfx thing might be interesting though.

1,031

(4 replies, posted in Creations)

Reminds me of

Ya, and that was similarly a misguided failure of a film. It's utterly unfunny as a comedy, but not serious enough to succeed as a "Simple Plan"-style thriller.

Ya, I wanna watch that just to get a feel for what he might do with Robocop. I've been cautiously optimistic about that remake, but Drew Mcweeny read the script and basically tore it apart on Twitter and said it was horrible, so who knows. Don't think anyone can top Verhoeven.

1,034

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Good suggestions there, though I would say that's pretty high pricing for most folks. You either do the movie-pool suggestions thing, and then release the commentary for free to everyone (money drives what movies get done, but the actual commentary is free), or you do the premium podcast model but charge a small minimum amount a la Filmjunk, otherwise almost no-one is going to chip in.

1,035

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The problem with that approach is it's focused on an "individual" person's donation. Individually, I doubt most people would donate more than 5-20 bucks, what's cool about a pool of movie commentary ideas is that multiple people will chip in money to see a particular movie done. For some especially popular requests, I could see a given movie pool going up to several hundred dollars, maybe even more. And it doesn't have ot immediately get done, some movies can sit around in there and slowly grow pledges, gaining more and more value. Then the DIF crew can look at the options and weigh which ones they want to hit "Is it worth our time to do a commentary for X movie for Y dollars". Obviously this wouldn't be the approach for ALL future DIFs, but this kind of sustained market-place would create competition between movie suggestions and drive donations up.

1,036

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I wonder if there's an online system you can use for something like that. It'd be similar to kickstarter, except that instead of reaching a goal, money only gets transferred when Teague chooses that particular project and uploads the commentary.

1,037

(45 replies, posted in Off Topic)

One option that's been working really well for the filmjunk podcast is they still release their normal weekly shows, but every couple of weeks they'll release a "premium" podcast, which they will charge a minimum of 99 cents for via BandCamp. Examples in their case have been things like doing the Back to the Future trilogy, Batman movies, Star Wars, etc.
Kind of trickier in your case cause you've already hit all the "biggest" movies, but occasional "premium" DIFs like this could be an option.

However, avatar's idea is even better in my opinion. You have a pool of pre-funded DIF movie suggestions to choose from, so you aren't obligated to do a particular movie you don't want to, but if you do do it, you'll get that money amount from DIF members. I can definitely see people getting together and throwing significant money to get you guys to do particular movies.

1,038

(8 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm kinda optimistic if Martin Campbell is doing the pilot. Wouldn't it be great to have a good, actual sci-fi show on the sci-fi channel again? Battlestar Galactica really is such a bizarro anomaly in their programming quality.

1,039

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:

Or how about Rothrock and Yeoh together?

Holy crap, I gotta track that down and watch it. How did I never hear of Cynthia Rothrock?
Was I just too young, being a child of the 90s?

1,040

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Brian wrote:

My question is, why Yeoh and no Liu? And also, can Michelle Rodriguez please go away forever.

This, for starters:

Though I agree Liu deserves a spot, certainly over Michelle Rodriguez and Vivica Fox

1,041

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Whoever played Nikita in La Femme Nikita

1,042

(16 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Geena Davis based solely on Long Kiss Goodnight, which is seriously one of the most under-rated action flicks of the 90s: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdxnlmbaMQU

Also Gina Carano, and Milla Jovovich probably deserves a spot too.

Dorkman, I've actually been saying that exact thing about Minority Report for years.
The movie fails for me because Lamar supposedly set Tom Cruise up, but he doesn't practically do anything to actually set him up, so the murder is essentially self-generated, which doesn't make sense.

I agree with your fix too, I really wish they'd done exactly that.

Lamer wrote:

That is amazing, and shockingly faithful/accurate

I'm still holding out hope that the remake never happens, it's one of the most profoundly pointless ideas I've ever heard. They can't top it in the action department, and the story is intentionally super basic and simplistic, why the fuck would you remake it?

And yes, Gareth Evans is currently working on the sequel, Berandal, which should be even more crazy.
Also, the dude has Once Upon a Time in the West as his Twitter background, and if you follow him, the dude is damn-near Tarantino-ish in his knowledge of the action genre. He's the real deal.

Please tell me that's Region-free. The US release has the shittiest cover art imaginable, I mean look at this cluttered mess: http://collider.com/wp-content/uploads/raid-redemption-blu-ray-box-art.jpg

I want that UK steelbook soo bad, The Raid is the best action film in years.

Ya, there's so many different ways you could go with the story. Another reason this was such a criminally missed opportunity. They could have totally started it out like the Arnie version, then have some crazy mind-fuck twist/subversion a third of the way through, and go off into a completely different story.

Ya, we desperately need hollywood trends to swing back towards the cheesier 80s stuff, cause I am so fucking tired of grim, lifeless action movies.

Fingers crossed for Expendables 2 (and also The Last Stand, if anyone can make an awesome Schwarzenegger movie it's Kim-Je Woon, that guy has an amazing eye for action)

The only thing I've seen of Richard Kelly's is The Box, and I'm not going within a mile of any of his movies after that.

I think there was a good Total Recall remake to be made, because the original is definitely a goofy and crazy approach to a great concept, and you could definitely make a serious version.

The problem is that they haven't made this new version any less crazy (and even less plausible by the sound of that elevator thing)

You're basically trading ultra-violence and humour for really elaborate CG action, and for me, the former is nearly always better in an action movie.

They should've truly thrown out the original movie and made something that felt completely different. I feel like a serious version of this story should be much more like Memento, or Inception, in terms of approach and style. Scale the action WAY back, make it an intense psychological mystery story. Get Nolan, or Alfonso Cuaron, or Fincher to do it. THAT would be a great movie.

As it stands, this remake seems to basically be the same ridiculous approach from the 90s version, but minus all the charm, humour, and violence that make it a memorable movie. So basically totally pointless.