2D, 24p. I don't have the option to view it in HFR here, but 3D is an option, which I'll be opting out of. I don't like 3D unless it's animated films.

Granted, the only live action films I've watched in 3D are Pirates 4 and HP7-2, which weren't shot in 3D, but still. I enjoyed it in How to train your dragon and Tintin, though the latter kind of lost the whole "WHOA IT'S 3D!" effect rather quickly. It was just there and not in-your-face at all.

1,027

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

whoa, this is actually still happening!?

1,028

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeaaaah, that's not an iMac. It's a great piece of machinery, though!

1,029

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Die Another Day, and The World is Not Enough are crapsticular. Tomorrow Never Dies is fair enough, and GoldenEye is king.

1,030

(20 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It is. From left to right spiders.

1,031

(29 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Honestly, I think we'd all fit better at a coffee shop in Amsterdam.

1,032

(29 replies, posted in Off Topic)

None of you have heard of Bleach? It's apparently pretty huge. Even has some decent fighting games on consoles, too.

1,033

(29 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I love this place. I wish it were a cafe we'd all hang out at.

'xept it'd be weird showing people trailers, cool photos, random creations, and pimping our youtube stuff all the time.


..no, wait, it'd be COOL!

1,034

(51 replies, posted in Off Topic)

oh, herro.
Do we get to make cool profiles about ourselves, too? Or other members, of course.

1,035

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Oh, of course not. Having an i7, a quadro card and some 16GB+ of high-speed RAM sure speeds things up, if you're not running some sick $4000+ editing supercomputer.

1,036

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,037

(18 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm plowing through heartgold For the the second time now. Still fun.

1,038

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Nope. But it isn't on the entry-level new iMac either.

1,039

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

*cough*
I opted for a different setup. There's an iMac 27" previous-gen being sold for appr. $1049 which has way better specs than the new one, which means I won't be getting the newer generation.

Pros related to the 27":
3,1GHz CPU(vs 2.5GHz on the new 21,5")
12GB RAM (vs 8 on the new one)
An optical drive (I might actually need one at one point)
27 inches. (this one's pretty self-explanatory)
User-accesible RAM.

Cons:
No USB 3. I don't know if I'll ever need one, but it'd be nice to have.
It's not as thin. (kidding, guys, I don't care about that)


You agree, right? I'm getting the top-of-the-line previous-gen 27" iMac for LESS than a new 21,5" entry-level iMac.
And checking the prices for a new one, I'm saving shitloads, and getting a better computer.

1,040

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Aye, that's usually the issue. It'll work faster than a mac, if configured correctly, but I would NEVER use one for my main workstation.

1,041

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

..Oh yes.

1,042

(956 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,043

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,044

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

Okay, nobody knows how to feel about this; here's a subjective weigh in at pros and cons.

Pros: Disney has made some GREAT stuff. Even recently. Ish. Look at the pirates of the caribbean trilogy. Some people disagree with me about them, but for me, the two sequels are great. Number 4, on the other hand, is something else entirely, but I won't go there.
Disney also acquired Marvel, which means they're directly related to Avengers. Thor and Cap aren't, as far as I know, affected by it.
Wreck-it Ralph. While I obvioulsy can't really say much about it, it sure as hell looks cool, which is a proof that someone somewhere is doing something right.

But I digress.

Cons: Disney. It may affect fanfilms in a bad way. Lucas stayed out of it, Disney probably won't. Star Wars is, at least for me, a complete trilogy. The prequels didn't bring anything neccesary to the table, and I doubt sequels will either.


Sure, we now get the sequels some fans have been nagging about since they were rumoured in the first place, but does Disney really have anything to do with this? If Lucas REALLY wanted to do them, nobody's ever stopped him before. He has the money, I assume, to do it, so why Disney? Why now? And why announce it now? It sounds to me like all they have thus far is "STAR WARS 7", and 3 years to come up with anything remotely cool, and complete it, too.

I don't know. I'll be looking out for news, and if a possible trailer for it, somewhere down the line looks cool, I might even check it out. It's not like it cna be worse than the prequels, right?

..right?

1,045

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Heh. Cool.

1,047

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,048

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

1,050

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I think that thing's on the SW Blu-Rays.

(No, I don't own said set of blu-rays. I borrowed it from a friend to get ahold of the bonus features. Which were very much dissapointing, I'm afraid)