1,101

(33 replies, posted in Creations)

THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM MY SOFA IS A FAN OF THIS CODE

VOTE NOW VOTE NOW

http://www.theforce.net/swtc/Pix/trailer/senate1.jpg

1,102

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

Funny you should mention, I just did a bunch of lightning yesterday.

1,103

(33 replies, posted in Creations)

I dunno what json is.

holden

This is fucking rad. Did it just load all of the images on the website at once, though? That doesn't seem very mobile-friendly.

1,104

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

*looks at page*

...I really don't get superhero comics.

It seems like it must be the sort of thing where you either "learned" to enjoy the comic book format at a young age, or you didn't. Such a weird barrier to entry.

1,105

(149 replies, posted in Friends in Your Dungeon)

Eh.

Ehhhhh.

Sorry — I like the idea of doing some sort of a gaming thing, but this seems (and even if it's not true, "seems" is what you're dealin' with at the end of the day) like a really huge and complex and intimidating commitment as far as gaming goes. If we were doing board games or something, just playing games, I'd be like nine times more likely to join on a whim sometimes. This is more like you're inviting me to come co-write and co-perform a play, y'know?

EDIT: Not to put too fine a point on it, but if your goal was to get as many people onboard as possible, another strategy might have been to pick the Nintendo Wii-iest of gamey games to start with, such that there's absolutely no continuity or barrier to entry for anybody who wants to take a peek, and get as many people as possible just to come into the chatroom and play some games for a bit... and then spring the book-and-homework campaigns on them, once you've made the soft sell.

1,106

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

Damn. Well done.

1,107

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TechNoir wrote:

Maybe not having Joss Whedon would be a blessing in disguise. Having more limitations might be what these films need, so even the Avengers films could benefit from some specific plot focus, rather than constantly having to fan-pander by trying to fill the film with so many different flavors that it ultimately just comes out a muted grey.

Time will tell I guess.

Here's my bet: Joss is the only person holding this fucking thing together. Trust me, it's not his idea to have a line-item list of seventy-five tie-in requirements per Avengers movie, and my guess is we're lucky that the person who was tasked with solving that problem was him. My exact point above (which, could be right, could be wrong) is that nobody else is going to be able to do an even halfway-shitty job of making these movies seem like movies.

In other words, you might be totally right that losing Joss will be a blessing in disguise, but if that's true, it's not going to be because somebody else would be better at telling a story while serving seventy-five masters.

1,108

(28 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The title of the thread doesn't make sense, I just like meaningless wordplay — I think Spader was awesome in this movie. Whatever.

Anyway, I liked it plenty, insofar as anybody can like one of these things. More than anything else, I continue to be meta-impressed by the Whedonvengers films, in terms of how deftly they navigate forty thousand bullshit hurdles and still manage to be anything other than absolute torture.

Warning: the rest of this is just a half-cocked rant. There's a tl;dr.

My main thought is that Avengers 3, or any major all-hands-on-deck Avengers follow-up that happens while the franchise is still this hot, has no chance on Earth of being even kind of okay. Not that Joss is infallible, I just think he happens to be the one motherfucker that history will look back on and say "yeah, I guess Joss was the only person who ever had a reasonable chance of doing this job well."

Basically, I arrive at that thought by pitting two conditions against each other — first, someone getting the job and the freedom to do it the way it has to be done... and then, that person doing that job well.

First, I can't think of anyone on Earth who stands a snowball's chance of getting hired to write / direct Avengers 3 and being given the kind of reign a director almost has to be given in order to tie a movie together out of it. Like, anybody — any other human on Earth being given that amount of freedom and responsibility. Only Kevin Feige himself, maybe, might be able to get that amount of responsibility, once. Everyone else — name a director, even a huge director — is going to be backseat-driven like a motherfucker by an impossible number of interests and cooks in the kitchen. I think they got Joss for Avengers out of terror and he demanded enough freedom, and then after Joss was the guy who directed global-smash-hit The Avengers, he got the same freedom on Avengers 2 because by then he happened to have made one of the highest-earning films of all time.

That explains how somebody got that job, and just enough freedom to do it well, once. That happened once, with Whedon, when he did his Avengers movies. That can happen to one guy, one time. Now that he's going off on a well-earned permanent fuckthatshit-cation, I don't think anyone else ever gets that same deal. It's too big now. I don't think anybody else ever even really gets close to having that particular set of conditions. I think whoever gets saddled with Avengers 3 and 4 is going to be micro-managed to the bone, and that's assuming that they hire someone who they only feel like they have to minimally micro-manage.

So there's that, Joss was able to get enough rope to hang himself with, and I don't think anyone else ever gets that much rope. Secondly, imagine someone does get that much rope — and like I said, literally the only person I can imagine being able to inherit that much auteur-power over an Avengers movie is Kevin Feige himself, who isn't a director — and now they have the exact same opportunity Joss had.

Well, the other half of this shit is that Joss happens to be, like, custom-built for exactly this series of impossible writing challenges. You also have to be Joss-Whedon-level-good to write one of these movies, given the myriad arbitrary requirements of corporate franchise-dom and also juggling like twenty-five leads in a bullshit cartoon apocalypse, and who else is on that level as a writer in this genre? If you can even think of someone, which... eh, maybe you can think of someone, but I really don't think so, Joss is sort of magically-qualified when it comes to this challenge... okay, sure, but: is that person given the rope to hang themselves with?

Has that person somehow demonstrated to Disney and Marvel that they can land a billion dollar movie with their eyes closed and should thusly be given complete trust and freedom to direct the movie the way their instincts are telling them to direct it?

Of course not. That's psychotic. That person will receive exactly enough respect and responsibility so they don't walk out of a meeting and go bomb Disneyland in a fit of rage, and no more. The rest of the responsibility will be diffused among ten writers, twenty producers, half a dozen executives and a few actors, because... frankly, that bet is like nine times safer.

The idea that these first couple of Avengers movies would contain like an hour of good stuff between the other hour and a half of giant fuck-all set pieces is a totally arbitrary one. These movies would still make start-a-new-country money if they completely sucked. They don't have to not-suck.

Anyway. I don't actually care about any of this, it's just a thought I was turning over in my head last night.

So, yeah. Avengers!

tl;dr — I don't think there's much of a chance that we'll get another good-ish "Assemble" movie. I think you need to already be Joss Whedon, and then be the beneficiary of a very singular arrangement of benefit-of-the-doubt, to even stand a chance.

1,109

(93 replies, posted in Creations)

I went off and outlined what the main videos in a followup Layout series would be. Now it's just a matter of finding the time to do it.

1,110

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

First place I worked out here, this artist in the same room as me was telling a story about how he was in an elevator once at some convention-hotel, cracking people up with his Stan Lee impression — 'EXSH-SHELSHIOR" and shit — and the doors opened, and Stan Lee was right there.

This guy was pretty sure Stan must have been able to hear him, at least a little bit, through the elevator doors... but he just sort of prayed that that didn't happen. Stan gets on, smiles politely at everyone, and the elevator continues down to the ground floor. Awkward silence ensues. After a moment, the guy decides Stan must not have heard him.

When they get to the ground, the doors open, Stan pats him on the shoulder re-assuringly, and leaves.

1,111

(100 replies, posted in Creations)

It does smell nice.

1,112

(100 replies, posted in Creations)

Ha! The candle is actually not a feature of this rig, usually. I brought that over at the end of the last live session so could stack my microphone up on something.

See, usually the green mic is in the "nice" mic stand off to the left, with the pop filter... but for "talking at the Mac laptop" purposes, I need to put the mic on the other side of the piano, so it gets put on the little gooseneck stand for these live computer sessions. But then — with the mic on the gooseneck stand — it was too short for me to stand/sing at the piano, so I put it on the candle to make it taller.

And then I didn't put the candle back where I found it, because I'm messy.

This brings us to the present.

1,113

(100 replies, posted in Creations)

Ha. Well, I can take a picture from where I'm sitting.

Here ya go.

(Four megs, so I made it a linky instead of an embed in case of mobile.)

1,114

(100 replies, posted in Creations)

IT WAS YOU.

I knew I was forgetting someone. Yessir, thanks for reminding me.

1,115

(43 replies, posted in Creations)

I still haven't cracked open this show. I intend to, though. It will happen!

1,116

(100 replies, posted in Creations)

Gonna get Owen in there vox-wise for sure, and probably gonna fill a lot of gaps with more Boter. Right now my priority is to fit everyone in there at least once, and once I'm past that I'll start doubling folks up.

You know, it's like dinner at the buffet. Or whatever.

I'm a little paranoid I'm forgetting someone entirely, though. Anyone come to mind?

1,117

(100 replies, posted in Creations)

1,118

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'll hang around on Skype chat until you have a chance to log on and we'll schedule sumthin.'

Everyone else, as you were.

1,119

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Skype-y thing, whenever you're available for an hour or so. The exact premise of which I shall spring upon you in the course of conversation.  big_smile

1,120

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doc, I have a conversation I wanna have with you — in podcast form — as it relates to Ex Machina.

(Let's say that I'm interested to see how you'll react. Bah-dum-ching.)

What say you.

1,121

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ex Machina.

Ex Machina.

1,122

(149 replies, posted in Friends in Your Dungeon)

Hm. I wish I had had the foresight to ask if there were games along these lines where you don't need to build a character first. "Just be yourself" sort of thing, to kind of one-thing-at-a-time the proceedings. First experience gameplay and see if it's up your alley, then expand on the experience by playing in character.

Oh well.

1,123

(2,068 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Just saw this for the first time the other night. Agree.

1,124

(149 replies, posted in Friends in Your Dungeon)

Cool. Sounds like you guys know what's gonna be happening now.

Just as a writing experiment, let's pretend someone has never done anything like this before. Give it to me in Captain Dummy talk, Kaylee.

1,125

(156 replies, posted in Episodes)

You too.  cool