You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Dorkman
Could be option D: this guy re-edited "City on Fire" to bolster his thesis and make it look like they're more similar than they are. Having not seen the film I couldn't necessarily say, but I bet I could edit THE DEPARTED to make it look like it ripped of City on Fire, too (and we know that was an actual remake of a different Hong Kong film).
Also there's option E: this is genuinely unintentional coincidence. I mean it seems like a lot of similarities, but really, what is there that's unique about any given aspect of either plot? Undercover cop, jewel thieves, robbery gone wrong, chase with police...even elements such as carjacking some bystander, crashing the car, and a Mexican stand-off seem pretty standard fare for this kind of caper movie.
Tarantino's not above lifting things wholesale from other movies, but he also wears his influences proudly on his sleeve. If he'd "paid homage" to City on Fire, I'm inclined to think he would have happily told everyone as much.
That would be tomorrow.
At least here in the states.
I'll just add a recommendation to Teague's advice, which is good. What he calls a "retarded pass" is more commonly referred to as an RGB pass, for the reasons that the only colors present are pure red, green, or blue. Obviously you're likely to have more than three regions of a model you want to be able to isolate, which is why in Teague's case he opts to embrace the full spectrum of color and have yellow and pink and purple etc. From my own experience, however, I would strongly advise against this and instead, render multiple passes of three regions at a time in R, G, and B only.
The reason being that any color other than pure R, G, or B necessarily entails a mixing of the colors and therefore a contamination of the color channels, which makes it more difficult to do exactly what you're trying to do: isolate a given region of the model. If you're dealing only with pure R, G, and B, all you have to do is isolate a given channel and bam, you've got your matte. Anything else and you're dealing with keys and levels and garbage matting to get the matte. It may seem like you're taking a lot of time doing repeated renders of only 3 things each time, but it will almost certainly save much more time that you won't have to spend doing the manual work of garbage matting etc. Let the machine do the heavy frame-by-frame lifting. And render the mattes to PNG to save disk space.
So: the people here who do not play video games feel that they are the best suited to espouse on the storytelling capability and value of the video games we've just established they don't play, and to tell the people who do play video games that they are incorrect in their direct observations of the video games which, as mentioned, they actually play.
...oh, I get it. You guys are joking. You had me going for a second there.
If we're after college students, I would have made "Free Booze" larger than "Live". But that's just me.
I also would recommend the exact address rather than an intersection.
Looking back, I'm willing to admit that I may have gone full Finifter on this one. I just hate it SO MUCH. I think it's the fact that Jake loved it that set me off, which I acknowledge is totally irrational and completely subject to taste but, you know, agh.
Still, next time I'll try to be cool like Fonzie and actually stick to an analysis rather than getting lost in the rage-fog, since it's probably not all that fun to listen to in retrospect.
I saw the movie before reading the book. I prefer (and love) the movie, actually. I had the same experience with KICK-ASS. I seem to like what Matthew Vaughn brings to the table.
Not that I hate the book, Gaiman's prose is always literary comfort food and plot-wise it feels very much like an old fairy tale which is exactly the point. But Vaughn diverged in precisely the right way, IMO, to make the story cinematically satisfying.
For future reference, it's generally preferable to say which movie you're spoiling at the outset, rather than making us read the spoiler in order to find out.
I love NETWORK hardcore.
One of the panelists (I think Trey) suggested precisely that as an alternative ending. I love the fact that it's a really twisted and unsettling "happily ever after." That ending would have been genius.
Without having a bunch of friends over to razz on it with you, and/or for the purposes of a podcast? Nah.
Birth of a Nation 2: The Rebirthening
(I'm done now.)
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Dorkman
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.