The situation might change if and when you do the LOTR trilogy, but looking back you've done lots of sci-fi and hardly anything in the historical or fantasy genres (except Master and Commander). I'd love to see you guys tackle Willow or Excalibur.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by redxavier
The situation might change if and when you do the LOTR trilogy, but looking back you've done lots of sci-fi and hardly anything in the historical or fantasy genres (except Master and Commander). I'd love to see you guys tackle Willow or Excalibur.
Great news! Congratulations to the happy (but probably exhausted) couple. Was it a boy or girl?
Anyway... Gabrielle Anwar is one of my favourite people in the world.
I loved Moonraker as a kid, mainly because it had that ludicrous space battle and the laser sounds were awesome. I watched it a few weeks ago and the plot is immensely ass backwards. Bond arrives at Drax's Californian French palace to investigate the disappearance of a shuttle and Drax spends the next half of the movie trying to have Bond killed, thus casting suspicion on himself and ensuring Bond stays on his case....
OHMSS I never much cared for when growing up, but as a late teenager I became aware of the incredibly riske story. It's basically Bond sleeping with pretty girls every night and getting busted because he can't keep his dick in his pants. No kidding, that's how the bad guys see through his disguise. It's got great fist fights too, probably the best up until the climax of GoldenEye. I recall Lazenby being something of a martial arts afficionado.
Just to further Dorkman's rebuttal point above, science fiction stories are usually allegories for contemporary issues rather than literal representations. The prawns remind us of the apartheid, but they're not supposed to be a direct substitute for those under apartheid.
So calling the film racist for its portrayal of the prawns is taking the allegory too far. After all, prawns fly space in ships and black South Africans don't.
You know, Zarban, those would have been my exact picks as well. I don't think the crew need to do all 22 movies but a sampling of the above would allow for discussion of most of the other movies.
YOLT and TSWLM are also great companion pieces, being essentially the same plot (villian tries to make US and USSR go to war by capturing their capsules/subs) but being wildly different in tone and themes. The first is all 'You only live twice Mr Bond' whilst stroking a cat, whilst the latter is all 'The things I do for England' now watch me escape with my union fucking jack flag parachute.
Crazy thought, but have you guys considered doing any of the Bond films?
Wait, can they be world famous when I've never heard of them?
Sure there are projects that Lucas has been involved in, Tucker, Howard the Duck, and Willow all come to mind - but none were the art films that Lucas said he longed to do (and all were dismal failures) and none were directorial efforts and saw only peripheral involvement. Though I have a soft spot for Willow. "I love you Sorsha? I don't love her, she kicked me in the face!"
Return of the Jedi is probably the weakest entry in the OT, but it still has some great moments. All the Luke and Vader stuff is right up there amongst the best of Star Wars and the space battle, oh my. There's a shot of a few fighters flying across the Death Star surface, an X-wing darting in and around towers and pylons and then diving into the superstructure entrance that is just... fucking brilliant.
It's hands down the best special effects shot of the entire series (and possibly ever).
For the commentary, I guess you could talk about the aborted sequel trilogy and Lucas' growing ennui over Star Wars, about Lucas' divorce and its effect on the editing, about the transformation of Star Wars into a merchandise-driven enterprise, about how the experience of ESB changed Lucas' approach and resulted in him getting gun-for-hire Richard Marquand instead of someone who would make the film their own... also, you could probably mention how Lucas ended Star Wars prematurely to go on to make other 'independment art' films and yet 30 years later he's done nothing else in his career but exploit Star Wars in some way or another (and Indiana Jones).
In terms of storytelling, Jedi is a bit of an oddity because it doesn't really follow the 3-act structure. It's first half is like an extended James Bond intro, with the heroes all getting involved in an adventure that has very little to do with the main plot. It's only at the midpoint of the film that we are told what this story is about, ruining the Emperor's day and winning the war. And I find that unusual.
Performance-wise, in this one it's Ford and Fisher that don't do quite so well, whilst Hamill knocks it out of the park. Ian McDiarmid's Emperor was a truly terrifying character and I distinctly remember that it was him more than anything else in Star Wars that scared me, the way he grits his teeth as he's killing Luke in particular. It's not a subtle performance, but it's definitely minimalist - which is the complete opposite from his acting in the prequel trilogy where it's over the top and almost pantomime.
Just be aware that Adywan's 'Revisited' edit isn't the theatrical cut but his own personal special edition where he adds stuff to backgrounds like new effects (of his own making). So... if you're expecting something else I'd perhaps not get this one. (Personally I hate it.)
Be sure to go for his Theatrical edit. That's the one you want if you want the original.
Count me in for an epic live show of Lord of the Rings. No kidding, I'd be there for the whole thing. Massive fan of the books. The movies are very good, excellent even, but they're not perfect. The question you posed for The Watchmen - could we have seen a better adaptation? - could be a good subject to talk about at some point in the 12 hours (my answer is an emphatic yes).
There would quite a bit to talk about aside from changes, the merits of the story, and what we're seeing at any given moment: the ensemble cast and what they went on to do, whether Peter Jackson is a good director or not (a recent greatest directors list placed in the top ten of all time), the visual effects and how they hold up today, the huge undertaking of making three movies at the same time, the impact on culture and the genre, etc.
I liked this quite a lot, and probably like it more than any of his other movies (I think True Romance is his best script) - mainly because of the first scene and the scene in the tavern. They are well written, smart, and full of tension.
Got the first two Lethal Weapons on HD-DVD - I'd rate them alongside the Die Hard (not the 4th one) and Beverly Hills Cop (not the third) films as the 80/90s action classics. I even like Lethal Weapon 4 (though mostly because of Jet Li I guess).
The Director Cut sounds interesting, may have to experience that experience. I give a thumbs up for doing the regular cut as a Christmas movie.
Though I'm still hoping you surprise me with a 'From the Earth to the Moon' double-episode special. ![]()
There are two ways she can get recognition. First is to persuade Duane to put her name back on as Co-Director. The second is to create a loud scandal that tells everyone what she did on the film, a viral message that tells the story behind the story. The two are mutually exclusive, and the latter course is an awful idea.
Even if the reasons behind Duane's turnabout are bullshit, going behind his back is going to rub the right people up the wrong way. She might be the greatest editor in world, but if she gets a reputation as 'that woman who raised a stink about being co-director', then her career could suffer. Especially so if the reasons aren't credit-stealing bullshit and more "well, she was only in the editing room and didn't actually direct anything". If she tries to damage Duane's reputation then he'll just come after her - and that's a battle she'll lose.
And there's no guarantee that her story will even be heard by those she wants it to reach. I bet Jessica isn't the only person to feel that she's getting short-changed, but I've never heard a story where, say, some assistant DoP finally achieved recognition for the look of a film he felt he influenced more than the DoP.
If she can't persuade Duane to give her due recognition, then she should just take the editor credit and move on. It's just not worth it at this point in her career. And yeah, don't work with the arsehole again.
I recognised the tune right away, but I was a bit confused and convinced myself that it just sounded similar. I was confused because I didn't think that kind of borrowing happened a lot (outside of trailers and temp tracks).
Don't mean to put you on the spot there.
I've got to give it to them, they don't let a lack of money affect their ambition. On the other hand, that's probably the greatest flaw of all their movies. Usually you don't try to make a monster movie about a giant whale smashing cruise liners, submarines and helicopters on a shoestring budget. Usually, you play to your weaknesses rather than try to compete with those who do have the money. It seems almost every one of Asylum's movies is a special effects extravanga wannabe and yet that's precisely the type of movie that needs a bigger budget. They feature almost hundred CGI SFX shots, which are the most difficult to get right. The best effect of the whole movie was the sliced off limb at the beginning.
I'm curious, just how much money do Asylum make off of their films? They must make enough to keep it going obviously (and buy them nice cars) but I just don't get it... who is spending money on these movies? They're bargain bin DVDs so they can't be making that much money off of DVD sales and there surely can't be that many people buying them?
What budget do Asylum films usually have?
Nice commentary. I was a bit surprised by how insistent the US Navy is on having their sailors working in near-dark conditions. There's one scene that takes place in an office during the daytime that's so underlit it must be some form of training.
I like it. Make it so! How much choreography have you done?
Would you guys consider doing commentaries for From the Earth to the Moon and the Right Stuff?
Oh, it can look great, but usually in combination with other arts in a mixed format; acting as a variation on the usual kicking and punching in a fight. Perfect for upping the ante between two combatants. But I think it's quite limited on its own.
There was a recent Donnie Yen film which featured grappling quite heavily, can't remember the title, but it looked great in combination with the usual.
I didn't much like it myself, mainly due to Mamet's insufferably convoluted script. Some of the characters just do rather strange improbable things. Chiwetel Ejiofor's strong central performance keeps it going but personally I don't find the grappling heavy Brazillian style to be that interesting to watch on film.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by redxavier
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.