Well done, a really neat trailer. I don't like the direction the game is going (it's another generic fantasy game pretending to be LOTR) but I'm sure you're not in control of that!
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by redxavier
Well done, a really neat trailer. I don't like the direction the game is going (it's another generic fantasy game pretending to be LOTR) but I'm sure you're not in control of that!
Well, in all fairness, that's the point. The aliens believe they have Kirk, not Shatner.
The same device doesn't work quite so well in The 3 Amigos, where Mexicans confuse TV show stars for the real things.
I liked this movie when it came out and still do. It's bad astronomy but it's fun and a good balance of humour, action, poignancy, and ups and downs.
There was something that was mentioned near the beginning of the Truman Show... I can't for the life of me remember it now.
I looked it up and even the almighty Google didn't know.
Hmm... I remember the Mission Impossible 2 trailer being pretty awesome.
The trailer for the first Matrix was great, with a perfect line of dialogue for it:
"No-one can be told what the Matrix is... you have to see it for yourself"
Yeah, I like it so far. Maybe also introduce the element that perhaps the outbreak in Asia hasn't been fully contained.
Which will form much of the motivation for the military and CDC to help the plane... or rather the pilot because in my mind, he's actually the cure everyone's looking for. He's the only guy on the plane who hasn't shown any symptoms, so everyone in the States wants to get him because he's holding the key to what is a killer virus sweeping through Asia. But landing that plane anywhere on the ground means a strong possibility that a new outbreak will start. So one of the conflicts in the story is that half the people in 'mission control' want him to land so they can get him and turn him into a lab rat, and the other half want to blow the plane to bits because they have no confidence in their ability to contain the virus wherever he lands... since the Chinese are doing it really badly. Towards the end, it could be revealed that CNN has reports of the virus in Europe. So, do they go for what could be the cure and risk the virus running unchecked across the US, or do they lose the potential cure and try to close all borders and stop the virus getting anywhere near US soil? Both sides are right but the debate will mean that people on the ground have some sort of drama for themselves (aside from romance and playing agony aunt over the radio).
I don't know, I just think the people on the ground need to be in some sort of jeopardy. But without going too far into 'military is bad' territory.
I feel you can't really have a story about a plane potentially going down and killing everyone on board without having at least one protagonist on board, or somebody intimately connected to your protagonist on the ground - you'll remember Die Hard II put McClane's wife on board one of the planes. So the story should definitely follow somebody on the plane. And when you have one person, unless he's a single pilot locked in the cockpit, he'll need other characters to interact with.
Or maybe that's the way to go - have the story be about the pilot who's flying the plane, a plane full of highly contagious 'Captain Trips' level infected people. He has to wrestle with the dilemma - does he sacrifice himself and crash into the ocean, does he attempt to land the plane with the help of ground control and the kind female voice at the other end, or does he follow a mysterious third party who insists that he land at a military base? What does his more experienced 'veteran but passed over for captain too many times' chip on his shoulder co-pilot think? And what about the passengers, who are trying to get into the cabin to stop him from killing them all even though they're doomed?
So you have conflicts set up multiple ways - with himself (he has a family waiting for him), with his copilot in the cabin (an uncertain ally), with the increasingly angry crowd trying to bash their way to him (and who try to sabotage the plane any which way they can), with ground control, and with the military (who come the climax could attempt to force the plane to divert).
Following problem solvers on the ground, who are in no danger themselves, lacks dramatic punch and you have to invent some bullshit reason about why they are doing what they're doing if they don't have somebody on the plane they know. 'I lost my little brother down a well when I was 11 and now I want to save everyone I can'. Reluctant heroes, ordinary people thrown into extraordinary situations, are arguably more engaging protagonists, and the scientist on the ground in his lab isn't in that extraordinary situation (he's just more stressed). It's perfect for a subplot though, the race against time that we return to every few scenes to get a break from the plane itself - although I like the idea of keeping all the action on the plane. We just hear about the scientists from the military guy, is he even telling the truth? And all we have of ground control is this measured and encouraging female voice, who seems to be saying all the rights things but is just a little too good to be true. Heck, it sounds like it's an automated voice sometimes...
As a huge fan of the Outer Limits, I'd have the ending be a real punch in the guts. With the co-pilot, who's become infected as well, forcibly overcoming our younger protagonist and landing the plane at the military base with its promise of a cure. Leaving our young captain tied up, the co-pilot opens the cabin door to see that the rest of the passengers have all died. He walks over and in between their bodies, somewhat horrified since this is his fate and then opens the plane door. He looks out to see an army of fully HAZMAT equipped soldiers pointing rifles at him. They fire and he crumples backwards into the plane where he can be seen by the captain. Soldiers board the plane and as the captain watches helplessly a soldier shoots the moaning co-pilot again in the head. Soldiers walk to the cockpit, pick the captain up and take him away. Outside over the shoulder of his apparent rescuer he sees the soldiers torching the plane with flamethrowers. Wide shot of him being carrried to a large complex of white tents. Roll credits.
Didn't DMC go off on a 1-hour tangent to some island with cannibals, and then there's a duel atop a wheel or something?
I remember thinking 'where is this film going?'. Not in that good way where you can't predict what will happen next, but in that 'this film has spent so long on this pointless track I've lost interest' way.
Ooh that would be me I think. Yeah, if memory serves, Trey said he had warned everyone about how it was a bad film to do a commentary on (or just a bad film period ;P) and talks about how he left the room to go and do something and returned to find the others struggling through the same damn scene.
Actually scratch that, the astronaut could be Charlton Heston. No chance for the caveman then.
Read them all a while back. I try to re-read them every year but end up just skimming them. I always, always skip FOTR up to the Council of Elrond (but usually skip FOTR altogether).
It's not until ROTK that you start to get Crowning Moments of Awesome. Aragorn's arrival at Minas Tirith, the unfurling of his new standard above the newly arrived ships up the Anduin, is a great moment.
That said my favourite line in the entire thing is from Faramir.
“I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend”.
The Unfinished Tales have some great LOTR stuff as well. Isildur and the Fords of Isen are really great pieces. There's a grandeur and a hint of tragedy to much of Tolkien's work.
I'd go with the stone axe. Longer reach you see.
Does anyone watch the Deadliest Warrior?
For a second, I was like 'they made an Alien 4?' and then I was like 'oh, so they did'.
An earlier script, which cut out all the craptastic Ripley-Newborn stuff, showed what might have been, featuring exciting chases through an hydroponic garden and a climax on Earth.
Still, the question is why? Just why?
I love the show but found series 3 and 4 much less interesting and the first half of 4 in particular was really hard-going. By this time, the show had become burdened by heavy-handed religious musings and an uneven mythology.
The Final 5 were the biggest problem for me as well - I just couldn't buy it. That I still watched the show afterwards speaks volumes of its quality. It didn't take long before I moved on and enjoyed what they did with the reveal.
I think there's a Geekza commentary?
I have read some of Secret History. I don't see it "laying to rest" anything more than that Vader wasn't Luke's father the whole time and that Darth Vader = Dark Father was BS. I have no problem with the idea that Lucas didn't want anyone to know that he was toying with the idea.
Notice I said, "THOUGHT that Vader MIGHT be Luke's father by the time they shot ANH." I don't know that he had decided that it was the case by then.
Then you should read all of the book. There's not a shred of evidence in any of the drafts that Vader was Luke's father. And not only is there a lack of evidence - to toy with something indicates using it - but everything about the development of Star Wars and the early writing of Empire shows that he hadn't even considered it, specifically the continued presence of Luke's father alongside Vader and the negligible role that Vader plays up until the start of ESB.
It's tantamount to hero-worship to argue that he had not only conceived the idea but was actively keeping it secret. A fact which makes even less sense when you consider that he was open about every other idea, inkling, and vague imagining during this period.
The relevation is the same as when Leia as Luke's sister. But no-one ever thinks Lucas didn't make that one up on the spot for ROTJ. Why? Because Lucas has spent the last decade going around trying to rewrite the story of Star Wars and how it's all about Anakin - and hasn't done the same for Luke and Leia claiming they were always siblings.
Hmm... read the 'Secret History of Star Wars', that will lay to rest any doubts that Vader was never even dreamt as being Luke's father until ESB was being written.
Yeah it was good fun. Thanks for letting us participate in our small way.
As a Brit, the American jingoism is a little tiring, but it's a damn good blockbuster and I love it just because of the epic climax. How often have we seen so many fighter jets?
Footloose - Kevin Bacon. Kenny Loggins' music. Need I say more?
Runner up is probably Red Dawn.
Sometimes it seems my only means of expression is via movie quotes. Here are few things that have crept into the exchanges I have with friends (it can be some obscure that some folks, especially girlfriends, look on in bewilderment):
Where the hell did that come from? What's going on here? (Mallrats)
Eet's bullshit, the cabinet minister, all of eet. (Predator) - and over time "cabinet minister" has become shorthand for bullshit
Can somebody tell me what kind of a world we live in, where a man... (Batman) - then add whatever's bothering you
You're about as useful as a cock flavoured lollipop (Dodgeball)
Now cowboy the fuck up! (Tears of the Sun)
Big fan of Stargate, right from the very first movie. I liked most of the series, though once they the Orii came along the mythology of the show was getting quite burdened. However, I loved that after years of addressing the old religions they sort of tackled Christianity/Islam via proxy.
I confess Atlantis didn't do much for me - it just seemed they repeated the same formula but in another location with a different enemy.
But SGU is pretty good so far.
On another note, Michelle Yeoh ain't Malaysian! She might be born there but she's of Chinese ethnicity.
Great commentary, I'm so proud of you guys, you managed to mention nearly all of the great movies (and far better) movies out there, from Hero to Tai Chi Master to the 5 Venoms.
A great Karate film is Black Belt, a Japanese film from a couple of years ago.
I've just watched 2012 and despite some forehead slapping moments I thoroughly enjoyed it. So yeah, as long as a film uses its stupidity in an engrossing, non-offensive way which is consistent with its overall tone, I'm all for it.
But when a film like No Country for Old Men suddenly pulls out a plot device from its arsehole that makes no goddamn sense, just so that its writer can get out of having to write a climax or resolution... that's when I have no tolerance.
Anyway... will check out Surrogates.
Ooh, CTHD. A wu xia movie with every imaginable cliche of the genre. Bamboo forest fight? Check! Tea house fight? Check! Gorgeous girl improbably disguised as a man? Check! Scroll of Awesome Technique? Check!
Still, I suppose if you haven't seen a wu xia film before this wouldn't have all been derivative and cringe-inducing.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by redxavier
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.