Starting a movie without a finished screenplay is one of the dumbest things you can do, especially with a director like Sonenfeld. That guy's a real-life Woodie Allen routine.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Zarban
Starting a movie without a finished screenplay is one of the dumbest things you can do, especially with a director like Sonenfeld. That guy's a real-life Woodie Allen routine.
That movie did bring us the classic "You should not drink and bake."
And speaking of filling Arnold filmography gaps. I watched Jingle all the Way recently for the first time. It's ok I guess.
Yes! That line stood out. It's especially hilarious the way he just mentions to Darren McGavin at the end "Well, my reunion with my wife went well." WHAT?!
I gave up on Jingle All the Way about half-way thru. Even DVDCommentaries UK couldn't liven it up enough to make it watchable for me.
I don't mean to say that all Seagal and all JCVD films are terrible (I posted here recently that I kind of liked Sudden Death), just that those two quickly settled into the same kind of dull crime pulp that Raw Deal is.
I just watched Raw Deal for the first time. This was one of the very few holes in my Arnold Schwarzenegger knowledge. It turns out that (surprise!) it's a terrible film, with dull characters and duller dialog, but the structure reminded my strongly of a Steven Seagal film. It's interesting (in a grasping-at-straws way, at least) to think that Schwarzenegger could have gone down the Seagal/Van Damme route, pumping out dull crime shoot-'em-ups year after year.
I think that the thing that separates them isn't acting ability or even star power so much as ability to pick scripts. I think that Arnie—like Stallone—knows a good story when he sees it, and that was what separated him from the lesser stars.
You are told to get a tattoo. What do you get, where, and why?
I get my name and Social Security number tattooed on the inside of my thigh, just in case my naked corpse washes up on a beach somewhere.
Question: You are given the task of redesigning your nation's flag to "better reflect recent history." How do you accomplish it?
I haven't seen The Pacific, but I know where you're coming from. As much as I liked Band of Brothers, I wasn't really interested in another story like it, and the reviews were kind of middling.
The reviews for Game of Thrones were great, but I'm only just getting into it with episode 4. The first two episodes had me wondering if I should resell the Blu-ray. Even so, I find it frustrating that the characters all constantly speak the subtext.
Ever managed a lucid dream? If so, any details you feel comfortable sharing, and did you do anything to bring it on?
When I was young, I used to occasionally have flying dreams where I would become aware that I was dreaming but I didn't have much control over where I went. I would just fly like Superman over wilderness landscapes.
So, in 1995, when I was messing with Visual Basic (it's a thing old people used to do after the hula hoop but before Fark), I wrote a program to play sound files at regular intervals, then recorded myself encouraging myself to fly and set it to play all night. Sadly, it didn't really generate any awesome flying dreams.
This partially explains my earlier post in another thread as to why I am not an Internet billionaire.
Question: if you could/had to live in another era at least 40 years earlier than present day, when and where would it be?
Tyrants have ruled over smoldering wastelands for thousands of years and still do in the filthy corners. North Korea is a starving hellhole. Parts of the Middle East are festering wounds. Parts of Africa are gangrenous ulcers. The Eastern Bloc was 31 flavors of human misery for 70 years. Medieval European monarchies were largely muckholes of disease and slaughter. Ancient empires were mostly slave-driven, human-sacrificing war economies.
Technically, Zarban, as we are now in the splitting hairs thread, that passage refers to the Antichrist and the end times.
As Trey said, that's the joke. Thruout that letter, Paul is telling the Thesselonians, "Take heart about those 99 problems you have, because when Jesus comes back, he is going to whip ass and take names, and the bad guys are going to die in a fire. And that is gonna happen soon. Word to your mother."
And then 2000 years went by.
Humans came up with atomic bombs about 70 years ago. And yet aliens from the future invade with chariots and space-clubs that have to shoot inhabitants individually, possibly the most inefficient way to take over a planet. You'd expect a scaly green finger in an orbiting ship to press a button, deploying 100,000 neutron bombs that wipes out all mammals on the surface of the planet. There's probably an app for that on the alien's smartphone.
This technological anachronism reminded me of Starship Troopers, where we've developed faster-than-light space travel for massive spaceships, and yet have to shoot the bugs with bullets.... individually..... over and over again.
First: there is no substitute for ground troop operations, Secretary Rumsfeld.
Second: aliens—they're so weird, huh?
Third: surely, the most inefficient way to take over a planet is to try to purchase it, parcel by parcel.
Where did Jesus promise the end of all wicked people? Is there a specific quote from a Bible verse?
Lesson To All Men
You guys are right about Fury & the Plinkett test. Good call.
The Plinkett test is NOT a good test for all characters. Plinkett's point was that the characters of Phantom Menace were fundamentally different from those of the original Star Wars. What he doesn't note is that the reason for that is that the characters in Star Wars are all stock characters: the peasant boy who yearns for adventure, the wise old wizard, the loveable rogue and his big oaf sidekick, the plucky princess, the black knight....
Characters who cannot be summed up in a discreet set of traits can either be flat and lifeless or complex and fascinating.
But Fury IS a stock character. To date anyway, he's the gruff but good-hearted coach. We could easily have gotten a "win one for the Gipper" speech toward the end of Avengers.
The risk here seems pretty minimal actually. If the new studio closes or demands too many late nights, you should still be able to go back to the previous studio, now with more variety of experience and probably get more money and more challenging work from them, right?
I've talked that title over with him, because it's not all about me. It's about the ducks.
And the aircraft carrier crashing into cruise liners.
And Steven Seagal in Godzilla makeup.
And John Malkovitch inside Andy Serkis doing a NIN cut of "Convoy".
And you guys.
...squashed into the Cindy Brady corner of a split screen.
a situation where the assembled members are trying to pick up Mjollnir ... and Cap. just picks it up (soooooooo easily) and hands it to Thor....
That is awesome.
I thought of something else. Just a throwaway line from one of the New York cops about how the Avengers don't need to worry about Brooklyn: Spider-Man's got that covered.
With the time constraints, I'm afraid we might lose a lot of that. But I have a solution: SPLIT SCREEN!
Hurry up! My friends and family are excited about my big-screen debut!
This IS getting a theatrical release, right? I mean, the budget for my alligator/wolf hybrid transformation effect alone was staggering. I'm eager to recoup that.
Have you read the book Zarban? Just wondering.
No. The books I read are mostly non-fic and classic fic.
...and then eventual Lisbeth (Who is teamed up with Blomkvist super early in the movie, which I get from a story angle, it's just something that struck me watching it)
It's funny that you say that, because from a cinematic point of view, they don't even meet for ages and their storylines hardly cross until then.
But I would still argue that the very conventional ending is the point. In the end everything about this story is about family.
I can see that, but I would say to the author, "If it's not about the cleverness of the mystery, then don't make it a locked-room mystery. Make it an ordinary disappearance." Because the motivations are screwy. Why try to confide in the kindly uncle and then disappear and never contact him again and reassure him that you're okay? Why never expose Martin anonymously?
My worst injury happened when I was about 10/11 and I had just put in my 'Master with Cracked Fingers' DVD, "Damn" the batteries in my remote had died, and there wasn't any chance of pressing play on DVD player (the function didn't work) so, as clever as I was I remembered back to a remedy a friend told me in the playground at school "If you bite batteries, they recharge a little" - Yes, I did it - and yes it bit in two. With the Acid making its way towards my stomach, the hospital rammed some giant pipe into my stomach and gave me treatment equal to that of a chest burster.
But aside from that, did you enjoy the movie?
As for my name, Professor Plum....
I always supported your innocence thruout the trial. Also, just between us, Mr. Boddy had it coming....
Spoilers for TGWTDT
I was fine with Lisbeth being a cipher, so that didn't bother me. And I quite liked Mikael and Erika's relationship. I thought that was sketched out deftly; it just wasn't the main story.
My only problem was the twist.
The whole point of the setup is that it's basically a locked-room mystery, and the solution to a locked-room mystery shouldn't be "the dude sneaked out of the room when no one was looking." I'm not saying it was bad; just that it ended up being more conventional than I was hoping.
In a way, it reminded me of Smilla's Sense of Snow...
You know what else? Tony Stark should have had a moment where he was forced to acknowledge Cap's awesomeness. "Everything that makes you special came out of a bottle"? We know that isn't true. Sure Iron Man put himself out there by accepting Cap's challenge of self-sacrifice, but it would have been greater if that moment was preceded by Iron Man seeing Cap take charge and put himself at risk, forcing him to say, "Now that's the hero my dad talked so much about."
Likewise, when Fury's assistant says Colson's trading cards were in his locker, Fury could have said, "They still are. These are mine."
I'm a shameless Cap fan.
Independence Day (I refuse to call it ID4; that doesn't make any damn sense) has slowly grown on me. I didn't get why my friends like it at the time, but it has a kind of trashy, goofy charm that also makes me kind of like Starship Troopers and RoboCop, altho RoboCop is more solid.
I saw Battle: Los Angeles this weekend and also Fincher's The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. I agree with Trey that the former was not bad, considering that it's basically a first-person shooter video game about nameless, faceless aliens invading Los Angeles and needing a bad whipping by a squad of plucky Marines and professional streetwise tough gal Michelle Rodriguez.
The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo was not what I was expecting. It was good, but I expected more of a thriller aspect, with some chases and a bit of action. Instead, it was kind of a straight up mystery and ended up leaving me with the feeling of an episode of Murder, She Wrote that had been rewritten for HBO and stylishly produced.
You know what else I would have liked to have seen in The Avengers (this movie I saw this weekend)? Nick Fury getting his legs and arm cut off. In the comics, in some versions anyway, he had these sweet robot bionic limbs.
Then, in another movie (maybe a Hawkeye/Black Widow movie), he gets knocked unconscious by an explosion, and his robotic limbs drag him to safety by themselves. How awesome would that be?
I want to know what exactly Fury's plan was for getting Hulk in the Hulk Canister so he could be ejected from the airship, and how exactly he justified building said Hulk Canister into the airship in the first place.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Zarban
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.