126

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Isn't that what a reboot is?

Sure.

128

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Better nerd than wrong.

129

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It's because, as originally designed, the saucer impulse engines are only activated when the saucer is separated, which holds throughout TNG and the use of the practical model. It's not until the CGI model in DS9 that the saucer engines are consistently lit up.

Yeah, I keep waiting for all this progress to finally get us to some kind of destination. I'm just going to wait to buy anything until then.

Well that could've gone better.

Wait, I'm two steps from Orson Welles?

Jesus Christ.

133

(14 replies, posted in Creations)

Matt Vayda wrote:

I think what Brian is describing is scaling; charging more for the high end stuff, and just a few bucks for the low end stuff.  That makes sense to me, the trick being to figure out what that is worth.  Offhand, the highest end product I can think of that I know I could consult on would be a car.  Cars go for thousands of dollars, so maybe a couple hundred to have someone do some research and then spend the day going around to dealerships would be worth it to some folks.  Computers are another area I can definitely consult on, but don't go for nearly as much as cars.  Teague suggested $40-50 for something like a computer or a mid-high end TV, which sounds about right.

Yeah, scaling. I think you'll find that when people are deciding whether or not to buy your services, they'll think of it in terms of paying a percentage of the price of the ultimate purchase. Psychologically, there's some magic number where they'll think, "It's worth it to spend 10% of my ultimate purchase towards making sure I get the right thing, but not 11%." I don't know what those numbers are and I doubt they'll consciously be doing the math, but I bet that's the thought process. The trick is figuring out what that number is for most people and getting as close as you can without going over. There must be scientific studies somewhere out there that explore the topic.

Matt Vayda wrote:

I'd like to reach a point where I can give some of that stuff away for free

I'd recommend finding something you can give away for free up front and right at the beginning. The free sample/gift is a time honored sales trick that primes your customer to be receptive to the idea of spending money.

It totally worked on me the other month, as a matter of fact. They were selling sets of knives in the grocery store, but you got a free gift just for coming over at the start of the presentation and standing through the first part. By the end of the first part, I was hooked enough to hang around for the whole thing and by the end of it...well, they got me.

The more interesting or novel the free gift, the better. In the steak knife case, it was this little orange plastic thing that was an apple corer. It was just really goddamn neat. In your case, maybe something like a PDF about picking an iPad cover. Or maybe a PDF that has a couple general research tips and tricks, something that says "Here's a taste of the expertise I have, which I will teach you for free. For the rest, my rates are very reasonable."

134

(14 replies, posted in Creations)

Agree that the business model really makes sense for the more expensive stuff. But maybe you could build up a portfolio of research/opinions on less expensive stuff like iPad cases and then offer that at a lower rate. Don't know if you'd get enough volume of that type of business to warrant the overhead, but if it's something you already have "in stock" so to speak, it might get you some money on the margins.

135

(23 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Embedded version:

Mostly fluffy B-roll, but holy moly that one spaceship shot. Very pretty.

136

(56 replies, posted in Episodes)

Matt Vayda wrote:

In my experience, atheists tend to be fairly well versed in religion, sometimes more so than theists.


That's why we're atheists.

I was already an atheist when I started Catholic High School, but it always seemed to me that the more fervently religious a person was, the less they had actually absorbed about their own religion, and this seemed to hold true as much for the faculty (both religious and lay) as it did for the students.

One of the first things we learned in religion class was that Catholics believe that the wafer and wine offered in Communion are literally turned into the body and blood of Jesus Christ. I clearly remember lots of emphasis being put on the literal transformation, that it wasn't a metaphorical or allegorical thing, it was literal and that's what separated Catholicism from Protestantism.

Then, much later, I got into an argument about this point with one of the dumber kids in our class (who was raised Catholic and made issue of my atheism more than most). He insisted it wasn't meant literally, while I tried to tell him otherwise. Later, he came up to me incredulously, "You were right, Brian!" Well, duh. We had already fucking learned it. And shouldn't you have learned that a dozen times over already over the course of your entire childhood?

137

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Eddie wrote:

She Brianed Me With Science.

Can that be my macro?

138

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Yeah, it's more a matter of the first team saying, "Look, this is what we think is happening and we did all this things that prove it!" And somebody else has to come in and say, "Yeah, but did you try these things that would DISPROVE it and see what happened?"

Not saying the researchers necessarily did this, but such is the process of science.

139

(12 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Repeat after me.

One experimental result does not settled science make.

One experimental result does not settled science make.

One experimental result does not settled science make.

But that would be pretty amazing. I guess we'll find out in a couple years. Maybe.

140

(102 replies, posted in Off Topic)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/22/Parts_The_Clonus_Horror_%28poster%29.jpg

141

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jaws was never my scene.

The Crazy Astronauts.

143

(37 replies, posted in Episodes)

My god, you're right.

*commits Sepuku*

144

(356 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I'm really into Coldplay.

You probably haven't heard of them.

145

(83 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dustin Hoffman as Ted Kramer.

146

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Buh?

147

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ah, I didn't know it was written by them. Makes me feel like perhaps I did judge it a little too harshly.

It really does all come down to what your expectations are calibrated to before you even sit down. I think I definitely did have a certain amount of "Pegg and Frost in a non-Edgar Wright film. Okkaaaaay, let's see what you've got..." Crossed arms and a harumph.

148

(17 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I wasn't as enamored. It seemed a little more paint by numbers and less authentic than something like Shaun of the Dead. A little more corporate, if I'm being cynical. I felt like they were getting a lot of mileage out of Pegg and Frost that wasn't necessarily in the material. None of which you should take to mean that I thought it was an abomination of a film. I laughed out loud a few times and overall thought it was pretty good. But I wouldn't put it on the awesome shelf next to Galaxy Quest.

But I could be being too harsh on it. I've only seen it the once and a preview screening at that. A DIF revisit would be interesting.

149

(19 replies, posted in Episodes)

It was embarrassing enough realizing how much Star Trek stuff I have. To literally have the Protector...yeesh.

150

(19 replies, posted in Episodes)

Wow am I glad I didn't end up buying that model and displaying it in my room.