151

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

My driver and camera man was Allen Coe.

Also, if you're gonna cut bullet3's bit, would you be cool with putting back in those extra seconds of me getting out of the car? In this cut, I feel it's a bit abrupt. I'm concerned if people don't notice it's me in that shot, then the fact that my shirt says "J-Dawg" on it won't be funny, which is why I wore it in the first place.

152

(569 replies, posted in Creations)

If I remember correctly, wasn't it originally intended to include the names of people who drove cars/operated cameras? I recall Teague specifically asking me for that info.

153

(44 replies, posted in Episodes)

No joke, my Mother was THIS CLOSE to naming me and my Sister, Jen and Kira, respectively.

154

(15 replies, posted in Episodes)

I had the misfortune of seeing Mission: Impossible 2 on my Birthday. What a self-indulgent mess that movie is. I'd put the rest of the films on about equal footing, in terms of quality. I do think Ghost Protocol is marginally better than the others, though. The action set pieces alone are fantastic, and this one doesn't have Ving Rhames in it (I preferred his more serious turn in the Dawn Of The Dead remake).

155

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

^^^^ This!!! All of this!!!

156

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

It's as if I said, "This sandwich is okay, but it's a little dry. Not enough mayo for me." And some are hearing, "Not only do I hate this sandwich like I hate Hitler, but I hate every and all sandwiches that aren't made exactly the same way I want." So, folks just come back at me with, "Well, I'm sorry your sandwich isn't soaked in greasy, high fat mayonnaise, Buddy! But of course it's not. A sandwich slathered in that shit would be disgusting, especially if they were all like that." smile

I'm simply saying the movie tried to have its cake and eat it, too and that didn't work for me. If it's possible for a movie to have it both ways, I just don't feel this one did that successfully. And besides, I already said I LIKE the movie.

It's not that I refuse to sympathize with these kids, it's that I tried to and ultimately can't, especially when the movie shows me some stuff near the end and goes, "See? Sad, right? Don't you just feel bad for them and like them?" My answer is, "Sorry, but no. It's not enough for me." But as I said before, my bigger issue is that the movie seems to be saying, "It's okay to aspire to be a thug. Look how cute these kids are and yay, they get to be in a gang! That's a good thing!"

And no, I wouldn't want a 30-minute court-room scene where the kids are punished, either. That would be too "After School Special." I'm asking for some kind of balance. I've not seen The Wire, so I don't know if the street kids there are different from the ones here. My view on this applies to this movie, not all movies like this because it's not the same. Not all movies are created equal. Presentation and execution count for a lot.

I can sympathize with an "unlikable" character or an "antagonizing" character or one that isn't squeaky clean (Dr. House and Walter White, for example). It's when the characters don't take any responsibility for the bad choices they make and try to pass themselves off as a victim of circumstance or a product of environment, that they've lost my interest or sympathy. Yes, these things are important and do play a role, but they're not the only thing going on. At some point, it falls to you and your decisions on which path to take, when more than one path becomes available.

For example, I had to stop watching Weeds because once Nancy leaves that expensive neighborhood, the show should be over. There's no good reason for her to continue to produce and sell pot and put herself and her family in danger. After that, I checked out because I knew any sympathy I had for that character was going to go away and I would start to resent her, dislike her and I would no longer get enjoyment out of the show anymore. At least, not enough to keep committing to it.

157

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

I happily accept the invitation! smile

158

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

Who shot who in the what now?

159

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

That's a good point. You know, because the events of this film are so claustrophobic and more intimate, it seems kind of microcosmic and we forget that this was just one, localized bit of the alien invasion taking place. Your suggestion that this was happening all over London (maybe even other parts of the world) could lead to some very interesting sequels or at the very least, some fun fan fiction on the internet. smile I'd like to hope that within those stories, any issues I had with this film would be remedied or nonexistent.

160

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

Heh, yeah.

I don't need to see redemption at the end of every movie, either. I was just asking for a little of it in THIS movie.

From Dusk Till Dawn ends the same way 48 Hours does and I love that movie. "Go home, Kate. I may be a bastard, but I'm not a fucking bastard."

161

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

Jimmy B wrote:

And despite being hailed as a hero for killing the aliens, Moses still knows he was responsible in the first place for killing the female alien. He knows his two friends died because of him, how can he face their parents now?

He never has to. The movie lets him off the hook.

Jimmy B wrote:

Oh, and who will get blamed for killing the two cops? Just because the films ends with people cheering does not make everything ok.

You and I know that. I'm not so sure the movie knows that. For a movie that reports to be all about "Actions have consequences", it feels more like, "Only some actions have consequences. Mostly, all will be forgiven if you apologize in the end, or it's not your fault because you, too are a victim."

162

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

Trey wrote:

An ending where Moses announces his decision to go to law school, or in which he and British Felicia Day get married, would have been more than a little ridiculous.

Yes, that would. Thankfully, no one here is asking for that.

Trey wrote:

Moses is probably gonna do some time, but overall this experience may have set him on a different path in life.

That may be true, but it's meaningless since the rest of those kids don't appear to have learned a damn thing, not to mention you now have the Junior Thugs to take Moses's place. Two of them. The thugs and their victim(s) see each other as people. How swell for them. I'm not buying it as enough for me to overlook what they've done and will most likely continue to do.

Maybe if they were merely pick pockets? A crime like that doesn't do any physical or psychological damage, as far as I know.

163

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

redxavier wrote:

Yup, I have the same problems with this as Pavlich. We're forced to 'protagonise' these vile, loathsome shits, and not nearly enough of them are mauled horribly by the creatures.

To paraphrase Teague: "This guy.... This guy." smile

164

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

I basically have the same issues with this movie that I have with Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World. It's fun, creative, well directed and entertaining but that's all surface stuff and I find it lacking beyond the technical accomplishments. And just like Pilgrim, it tries to have some sort of substantial arc or message towards the end but by then, it's too little, too late and doesn't feel earned at all. It seems to justify the kids' actions as being that of a poor man stealing bread to feed his starving family and I don't agree with that. These kids (most of them, anyway) come off more as delinquent sociopaths who steal and threaten because they enjoy terrorizing people, rather than poor castoffs, forced into a life of crime in order to survive. I call bullshit.

Then you have the two little kids, Probz and Mayhem. They idolize these older thug kids and want to be one of them. The movie seems to be fine with this idea and actually sets that as a reward for them, so we're supposed to be happy for them when they get what they want, having suffered no consequences for attaining that goal. To me, that's horrible!

The ending of the movie reaffirms this message, when Moses, the leader of this gang who assaulted a Woman at the start and threatened her with a knife, destroys the monsters and "saves the day" and everyone, EVERYONE is cheering him on as a Hero, which makes no sense because most of those people in that crowd don't even know who the hell he is!

While I understand the movie is about "community" and all that, I don't think the movie does a good enough job to make it clear that the "block" is some kind of close-knit "family" who are all in this together and take care of their own.

Don't get me wrong, I like the movie, I just don't think it's a particularly good movie, which is exactly how I feel about Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World.

165

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

My podcast episodes are 64k mono only because they have to be. I have a limited amount of storage space each month (250 megs), so compression must take place. I've yet to run into many people here who think the file sizes should be smaller. I mean, I'm happy with the download taking longer if it means the audio sounds better/cleaner. It's kind of odd to use that professional setup you have with all that nice equipment, only to then output to 64k. Just my opinion, maybe I'm alone here and should shut up and enjoy the free thing. smile

166

(72 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'll share my thoughts on this film later but right now, I have a technical question about this episode. I just downloaded the file, so is the bit rate supposed to be in 64k? The episode sounds tinny. Contagion was in 160k.

167

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

switch wrote:

booo!  I don't like these rules!  I already posted my three in the other thread.  What do you want us to do Pav? LIE?!

If I really have to follows those stupid rules, I would have to say:

1. Empire Strikes Back (1982)
2. Back to the Future (1985)
3. Karate Kid (1984)

  facepalm

See, that wasn't so hard, was it? And look how nice and diverse it is. smile

168

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman wrote:
Mr. Pointy wrote:

Neverending Story being very close too, they showed that on HBO A LOT, back in the day

Ah yes. This one gets honorable mention for a childhood rotation movie, but this came in after I'd already watched the others about a million times each.

I actually really want to do a commentary for this because it is possibly the bleakest, saddest, most disturbing kid's movie of all time. (And the sequel is no slouch in the fuckedupedness either.)

Dorkman, I'd be delighted to have you back on Sofa Dogs for that one, if you're interested. Also of note, next Summer marks the film's 30th Anniversary.

169

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TechNoir wrote:

I don't know, they're not really that similar in my mind. I hope this can be acceptable. smile

Nice idea for a thread btw, I had never really thought about this before, I tried so hard to remember the labels of the VHS tapes we had at home but it feels like so long ago now...

You make a strong case, so I'll allow it, just this once. Don't anyone else go gettin' any ideas about technicalities! I want you guys to dig deep into your brainy brains. I'm loving some of the choices, by the way. This is turning out to be more fun and insightful than I expected.

170

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Hansen wrote:

Not being able to mention any runner-ups is killing me, so Pavlich, know that I hate you.

Take a number and get in line, Sport! smile

171

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Jimmy B wrote:
Withkittens wrote:

3.)LOTR (2001-2003)

Rule-reading fail big_smile tongue

Seriously, folks. It's not like I'm asking a lot here. You have three spaces. This should be super easy. smile

172

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

TechNoir wrote:

1. Terminator 2 (1991)
2. The Terminator (1984)

Please pick one of these and fill the empty spot with something else.

173

(27 replies, posted in Off Topic)

NOTE: This is the TEEN version of this game (13-19). The CHILDHOOD version (12 and Under) can be found elsewhere in the Off-Topic section of the forums.

Okay, so during WAYDM's commentary for The Wizard Of Oz, Dorkman declared that film, Annie and Ghostbusters as the three pictures in heavy rotation during his childhood, which went on to define his tastes. Basically, those three films tell you exactly who Dorkman is, what he's like as a person. This created a kind of "game" in the forum thread for that episode, so I felt it should have its own thread.

Here are the rules: 1. Only 3 films (none of that runner-up, honorable mention or tie bullshit. You MUST limit your submission to three. That's the fun, challenging part. 2. Let's put the cut-off point at age 19. So, only films you "grew up on", between the ages of 13 to 19. 3. Include the year of release for each film. It gives a time stamp of sorts, allowing to track how old you were when it came out and when you might have seen it. 4. No Doubles or Triples, meaning you can't just list two or three films in a franchise (so no Star Wars, Empire AND Jedi. Pick one out of the three).

I'll go first:

1. The Crow (1994)
2. From Dusk Till Dawn (1996)
3. Can't Hardly Wait (1998)

174

(34 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Okay, so during WAYDM's commentary for The Wizard Of Oz, Dorkman declared that film, Annie and Ghostbusters as the three pictures in heavy rotation during his childhood, which went on to define his tastes. Basically, those three films tell you exactly who Dorkman is, what he's like as a person. This created a kind of "game" in the forum thread for that episode, so I felt it should have its own thread.

Here are the rules: 1. Only 3 films (none of that runner-up, honorable mention or tie bullshit. You MUST limit your submission to three. That's the fun, challenging part. 2. Let's put the cut-off point at age 13. We're entering into Teenager territory at that point and that's a whole different game. So, only films you "grew up on", before you turned 13. 3. Include the year of release for each film. It gives a time stamp of sorts, allowing to track how old you were when it came out and when you might have seen it. 4. No Doubles or Triples, meaning you can't just list two or three films in a franchise (so no Star Wars, Empire AND Jedi. Pick one out of the three).

I'll go second. Dorkman counts as first:

1. The Breakfast Club (1985)
2. Night of the Creeps (1986)
3. Three O'Clock High (1987)

175

(62 replies, posted in Episodes)

Dorkman: "He also played Woody.... Make your jokes here."

THERE'S A SNAKE IN MY BUTT!.... (I'm sorry)

Teague: "Water! My only weakness!"
Brian: "Just like in the movie, Signs!"

Well, she IS Green! smile

Anytime I hear the line, "Surrender, Dorothy," I am happily reminded of the Scorsese film, After Hours wherein a character is mentioned yelling that out whenever he climaxes during sex.