Does it come in a range of scents?

We've lost Teague everyone. I repeat. We have lost Teague.

A bit more of a higher thinking question this time. I've been doing a lot of reading and looking about lenses lately, since that's one area that I'm still very very new to.

And I was just wondering what the shooters here think.

Right now I'll be working with a GH2, which is a micro 4/3rds lens mount. But obviously I'll be moving up to something bigger and better eventually, something that will most likely not have a m4/3rds mount. If I'm building my glass kit, should I buy for the m4/3rds and then use an adapter later, or do I get something else that's a great piece of glass and adapt it down to the m4/3rds?

Mostly I'm just getting confused because I hear all these shooters talking about this and this lens being something that you'll use for the rest of your life, but the lens mount is the mount and that changes just from camera to camera let alone over time.

Or maybe I'm just thinking about this entirely wrong and should just go back to reading.

EDIT: Obviously most of this is completely hypothetical at this point. I won't be getting any lenses of my own for a long time. But I'm just trying to understand the logic of it all. Just thought I'd clarify that.

Um...3 things...

A) WTF (What the fuck)?!
B) WTF (Why the fuck)?!
C) WTF (Who the fuck cares)?!

Cool, thanks man.

I'm about a week or so away from finally being able to get the first bit of my camera gear. I'll be grabbing a panasonic GH2. And so long as I did my math right, I should have enough left over to get some toys.

So I'm thinking of getting this mic kit: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7 … phone.html

This head: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/6 … _Head.html

These legs: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/6 … ripod.html

and this case: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/6 … d_Bag.html

Any thoughts on the choices would be appreciated

I figure this should be enough to get me going until I can get together enough to sink into some pro lights and lighting gear.

Here.

Haven't even watched it yet...but I'm calling CnD in 3...2....

Ooookay, contest thing.

I was thinking it was some sort of general docu thing.

Got it.

Wil Wheaton, Felicia Day, Riki Lindhome and Kate Micucci play a board game.

Wil Wheaton, Grace Helbig, Hannah Hart and Greg Benson play a board game.

I just discovered this series, I am in heaven right now.

Oh yeah...just the US...

But otherwise, I pretty much agree.

Finally got some time to listen to this one.

When you guys were having that whole debate about the Hunger Games being akin to a reality show and the Hunger Games being a comment on the people who watch that sort of thing and Teague was having that whole disconnect of "reality tv show with volunteers" vs. "People drafted into the game to kill each other". I'm really surprised no one brought up (or if they did it was so brief I missed it) the fact that the Hunger Games are basically a literal translation of Gladiatorial Events into this world.

What are essentially slaves are picked out of the crowd, thrown into a ring filled with booby-traps and dangers, (And dictatorial puppet masters that every so often might want to throw a lion or something into the mix just to shake things up) given weapons and told the last one out alive gets to live and gets a reward. While hordes of onlooking citizens watch gleefully and are entertained.

Of course, there are aspects of reality tv show in there as well, but I think that's mostly just a side effect of the upgraded technology of it. If The Romans had TV cameras you can bet your ass they would have shown it across the empire.

IDK, that's just always been my reading of the whole Hunger Games thing, less Survivor more Gladiator.

EDIT: Removed the line confusing my point.