Re: Pick the Big Six
If I have to take on the mantle of early 20th century dictators to convince everyone, then so be it...
Go for it. They were great at being persuasive enough to make people believe all sorts of crazy shit.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
If I have to take on the mantle of early 20th century dictators to convince everyone, then so be it...
Go for it. They were great at being persuasive enough to make people believe all sorts of crazy shit.
Teague will change your member status for anything. A polite wave and he's all over you.
Does waving at my monitor count? If so..Hi Teague!
Yep.
Okay everybody, please wait outside. Let the lady count.
Snacks will be provided.
question: how come I have no karma?
Last edited by switch (2012-01-13 02:07:06)
Okay everybody, please wait outside. Let the lady count.
Snacks will be provided.
Good luck with the counting. With all the tallies to add up I would have to not only use my fingers but my toes as well.
Be that as it may, I'm hoping that there are no mistakes in the "adding up" and the announcement of who the Big 6 are revealed won't be too long to make.
LET THE ANTICIPATION BEGIN!
question: how come I have no karma?
![]()
You get karma by folks clicking the "like" button on your posts.
So, basically, because you're not likable.
*plays the waiting montage from Little Shop of Horrors*
If DiF really wanted to drag out the Big 6 reveal they could do some sort of video where 1 by 1 the winners are determined.
LET THE ANTICIPATION BEGIN!
I see you shiver with antici...
*gives switch some karma*
thanks to the three people who gave me karma!
Last edited by switch (2012-01-13 02:18:37)
Snacks will be provided.
Can those snacks include fish fingers and custard? [Doctor Who reference]
Teague didn't give you that title... a few days ago I was bitten by a radioactive spider and woke up with mod powers as well.
Bwahahaha-
*cough*
-hahaha!!
OK, I can't say I am *100%* comfortable with the change in direction. Here's my worry:
If you do a commentary for a movie, you are kinda forcing yourself to talk about the movie for 1.5-ish hours, and to adress *all* of it, which I really like. While you in theory could say "lets talk about film X", and in a freeform format simply talk about it, there is a risk that
a) You forget to talk about certain things
b) You end prematurely, as in "okay... so we covered Transformers 3, what shall we talk about now"... crickets.... or you jump to the next movie and blow your wad too soon....
While I agree, some movies simply don't merit a full-length commentary, and I frankly preffer the dissective commentaries that aren't really paying attention to whats on screen anyway... maybe this will be all good. Still, the act of you guys actually watching it somehow... spurs you on, in a way that I like.
Having said that, I enjoy the intermissions, and kinda dislike the arbitrary 30 minute imposed limit of it (always ends when it's getting good*) so maybe this will all be perfect?
Irregardless, I hold a completely irrational fear that DiF will decline in this new format. So please, prove me wrong.
Oh, and I want more Trey anecdotes. Now that Batman Returns made the list (yay!) I can die happy to know I will hear the Walken story. The only movie where Walken is more Walken than in B:R is probably a View to a Kill.
/Z
* = "Thats what she said"
Owen Ward wrote:*gives switch some karma*
thanks to the three people who gave me karma!
Six now.
And you're welcome
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.