Topic: #37 - Are We Worried About Pixar?
And today, it was announced that Finding Nemo 2 is coming out.
I have a tendency to fix your typos.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
And today, it was announced that Finding Nemo 2 is coming out.
But directed by Andrew Stanton... so kinda good news/bad news...
Yeah, it's a shame about that. But they do have a whole bunch of non-sequels lined up so if that's how they want to do it, a few original films followed by a sequel, then so be it. Why Finding Nemo though escapes me.
When I was younger, I really wanted A Bug's Life 2...still waiting...
My little sister is ecstatic. Yep, I'm officially commencing banging my head against the wall.
Last edited by Abbie (2012-07-17 21:42:15)
And today, it was announced that Finding Nemo 2 is coming out.
I give up.
Last edited by BigDamnArtist (2012-07-17 21:45:25)
Personally I'm champing at the bit for Cars 3 - The Matering.
Personally I'm champing at the bit for Cars 3 - The Matering.
*The Metering.
The story of the corporate takeover and taxation of all parking beds in the cars universe.
Toy Story is one where, really, you could do endless new films if Pixar was willing to recast. Have an entire new bunch of toys in a new house with new problems. Nobody ever likes that, though, especially the money people.
(There was one book series, can't recall if it was Roger Zelazny's Amber books or something else, where each was to have a new main character until the publisher nixed the idea. The Friday the 13th and Halloween movies were to not have continuing monsters either)
Ugh, it's over as far as I see it. With Incredibles to Ratatouille to Wall-E it seemed like Pixar was really reaching out of the "kid's movie" game and were going to tackle more intelligent, adult stories. In retrospect Wall-E really was the peak of that kind of risk taking (or maybe the first 15 minutes of UP), and now it really is a steady fall back to known properties targeted at kids who will buy toys. I was really holding out hope for a kickass PG-13 pixar movie, but that hope is basically dead now.
I wasn't a huge fan of Finding Nemo, it and Cars are the only Pixar films I have only watched once.
Last edited by Jimmy B (2012-07-17 22:08:20)
I loved Finding nemo but it's in the same category as the rest of the ones they're doing sequels/prequels for. The story has been told, there is nothing more that needs to be told. So just stfu and leave it lie.
(Which is also my same argument for my loathing of the Ice Age sequels...but that's a whole thing that I AM willing to go full rage face over, so I'll stop now.)
Last edited by BigDamnArtist (2012-07-17 22:09:25)
I was really holding out hope for a kickass PG-13 pixar movie, but that hope is basically dead now.
Were they ever doing anything that suggested a PG-13 film sometime in the future?
bullet3 wrote:I was really holding out hope for a kickass PG-13 pixar movie, but that hope is basically dead now.
Were they ever doing anything that suggested a PG-13 film sometime in the future?
The Pixar Brain Trust made one recently. It was called JOHN CARTER.
The Pixar Brain Trust made one recently. It was called JOHN CARTER.
Keep using that kind of language around here young man, and someone will be washing your mouth out with soap!
Pixar aren't dead, they've just become Disney.
I didn't think John Carter was that bad........
It wasn't bad, it was just a Disney movie. If the target audience isn't 12 year old girls, then Disney has no idea how to market it. They even changed the title of the movie because "John Carter Of Mars" doesn't sound like something a little girl would want to go see.
Also, it was pretty bad.
I still haven't seen Toy Story 2 and 3. At least I have something to look forawrd to.
Last edited by Lamer (2012-07-18 00:10:31)
Squiggly_P wrote:It wasn't bad, it was just a Disney movie. If the target audience isn't 12 year old girls, then Disney has no idea how to market it. They even changed the title of the movie because "John Carter Of Mars" doesn't sound like something a little girl would want to go see.
Also, it was pretty bad.
Ha. I honestly didn't mind it. I have seen much worse. I didn't find it offensive, anyway, let's put it that way. Dull, sure, but not offensive.
I have yet to see Battleship, I'm pretty sure that'll be worse than John Carter. I'm trying not to prejudge it....which I have already failed at.
The montage near the beginning of UP was unflinchingly adult. Among the most ballsy sequences Pixar ever did. The second half of the movie was your typical dumb chase-action stuff
I would watch a DUG spin-off movie by Pixar.
OK, now that Pixar has fallen, and other animation studios are putting out good films... can we STOP referring to these movies by studio? Name the director. Name the head animator. Whatever. We don't assume all live action films from a studio have a certain quality, and we shouldn't in animation. Especially as the top creative people start to move around, freelance the same way live action directors do. Let's give the actual creators the credit.
Toy Story 4?
I think the problem Pixar are having is that they've started to think up concepts and then build a story round it, instead of the other way round. For example, I think I remember hearing that Toy Story was made because someone in Pixar had the idea "What happens to our Toys after we grow up?" which is an interesting question and a story that you can tell. Now I feel like its more about the concept and the demographic that they're trying to target. For example, with Brave they wanted to make a film with a female lead to attract young females and then they realised they had to make a story, which seems to me to be a bad way to make a film.
And I think corporate politics, like has already been mentioned has had a big part in it.
Actually, Toy Story was made because they could do plastic really well, and found a story they could tell.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.