WHen he did that laugh, I leaned over to Mike and said, "Well....that was certainly a....choice."

802

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I've been practically begging the DiF crew to do 24 Hour Party People.

803

(80 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yup.  Who also writes for Nikita and is writing a ST:TNG comic book as well.  Who also produced Knudson Menace with me.

804

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dr. Who is the one with a magic school, right?

805

(431 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I, however, am a big kitten.

806

(80 replies, posted in Episodes)

That's my buddy (and husband of Amy "Pink FIve" Earhart) Terry Matalas in that clip.

807

(255 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Reading "Unconditional Parenting," by Alfie Kohn and "The Power of Habit," by Charles Duhigg.

Read into that what you will.

808

(316 replies, posted in Episodes)

I want to clarify my LOTR comment because I was having just a hell of a time articulating my point during the episode.  I still love LOTR and find it's achievements breathtaking.  But I absolutely did mythologize them a bit after my first viewing, and can now actually SEE flaws where before I found them to be flawless in every way.  It does not diminish it's importance, I just grew up a bit is all.

You're being a bit hysterical.  Look at the map not as a state red and blur breakdown, but county wide, and you'll see a giant nation of purple.  Here in California, Orange County is massively red, San Diego is largely red with a giant blue crown,San Fran is ultimate blue, and all the farmland in central and nor cal is red.  The political middle is still much larger than the extremes of both parties so no old civil war anytime soon.

810

(473 replies, posted in Episodes)

fireproof78 wrote:

I wonder what happened to make him change his mind about sequels.

I think it may have been the 4 Billion dollars.

811

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Lamer wrote:

What's the point of this?

Well you see Lamer, the thread is entitled, "Cool Videos," and while I agree that cool is a subjective term, I found the video to be cool. 

If you're asking a broader question as to why the Dog Brothers host their regular gathering events, that's a longer answer.  The Dog Brothers train and teach in many of the filipino Martial Arts.  Most filipino martial arts involve heavy use of weapons, specifically staff, stick, knife, chain, and whip.  Arts like Eskrima, Kali, Arnis, and Silat all emphasize use of weapons in close quarter combat.  Now, in most martial arts if you want to spar, it's easy.  You simply throw on some gloves, some pads, and go to town.  If you want to take it to full contact 2 way live sparring, that's where cups, mouthpieces, and head gear come into play.  If you want to compete and test your abilities, there's many avenue's to do so.  But for people who train in weapons, your avenues to live test your skills are limited.  About 20 years ago, the Dog Brothers started hosting their gathering events in various Martial Arts schools through southern california.  I went to a couple back in 99.  They were as close to a real fight club as I've ever seen.  Rules and weapons are agreed upon beforehand, and while no one wants to go ot the hospital, as it is said in the beginning of the video, only you are responsible for you. 

Everyone I met at the gathering was about as nice and gracious of a person as you could possibly construct.  In fact, the nicest people I have ever known, were the ones who knew what a real ass kicking felt like.  To further this whole question as to why, I shall post another video I think is really cool.   This was taken at my jiu jitsu school the night Joe Rogan got his black belt in Jiu Jitsu.  Jump to 4:13 of the video.

I've always been a fan of "Killing Priscilla."

813

(1,649 replies, posted in Off Topic)

As an MMA fan who has watched it go from literal underground clubs to selling out stadiums, it's refreshing to see the Dog Brothers still doing their thing.  I went to a Gathering back in 99 I think, and it was a great time.  Everyone was really friendly, but man did people get the SHIT beat out of them.  Warning, this may be too much for you if sand irritates your vagina. 

814

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sam F wrote:

It's a great program, and plenty of professional production companies use it.


Not one of them is one I know of.  Bunim-Murray switched 150 workstations from FCP 7 to Avid.  Authentic switched 95 workstations from FCP 7 to Avid.  Collins Ave switched 55 workstations to Avid.  WALTER MURCH just switched away from FCP.  This is happening all over LA right now.  And most of them are still running Avid on MAC Pro's, so its not an Apple bias.  FOr professionals who have to make airable programs, even with the recent additions, it's still not up to par.  I don't see anyone even going near it until the figure out some sort of backwards compatibility with FCP 7 projects.

815

(198 replies, posted in Episodes)

I think we would need Chad Peter on that one.  I funded an indie documentary, but I think that would be under the "what NOT to do," category.

I'll establish this right now: "The Comedy," is in no way an actual comedy.  That's not to say that there are no moments in the film where you'll laugh, because there probably are.  Any laugh earned, however, will eventually be overwhelmed by a great unease, which will give way to a skin crawling disgust, only to fold back in on itself like an Escher painting, until you find yourself laughing again.  Which, about 20 minutes into the film, I realized was exactly what Writer/Director Rick Alverson and star Tim Heidecker (Tim and Eric's Awesome Show! Great Job!) intended. 

(FULL DISCLOSURE:  I used to work with Doug Lussenhop, editor and writer for T&E)

So if it's not a comedy, then what is, "The Comedy," supposed to be?  It seems to exist as a scathing middle finger to a disturbingly growing population: the entitled, white, male, aging hipster.  It's ironic then, that most of the cast and crew are made up of exactly that.  It is in that regard that "The Comedy," is sort of brilliant when it's not disturbing or even frustrating.
 

The plot is thin enough to barely spread over the course of its running time.  Swanson (Heidecker) is a 35 year old hipster who lives on a houseboat near Williamsburg, New York.  He spends most of his days traversing through the city either alone or with his peer group, made up of real life collaborator Eric Warheim and, in odd yet inspired choices, James Murphy (LCD Soundsystem) and Gregg Turkington (better known as the comedian Neil Hamburger).  Their existence is justified solely by fucking with everyone and everything they encounter, and cloaking themselves in an impenetrable shield of irony and sarcasm.  As a group, they only seem to drop this facade when one of their group in fact isn't sarcastic enough or attempts to have a sincere moment.  From the outset, we learn that Swanson has an ailing father, and he stands to inherit some undefined fortune.  It is this impending event that sends our....protagonist?....off on a series of escapades that make up the bulk of the film.  Many screenwriters would use this tragedy as a way to guide the character of Swanson on a path towards self discovery, and hopefully redemption.  Nope.  Not happening here.  If anything, the spectre of unlimited resources seem only to encourage Swanson and company's bad behavior, perhaps out of a sense of panic that the adult world can no longer claim them.  It is in this that makes the film unique.  Tim and Eric, as well as most of the onscreen talent has acquired a fan base through their own work that is made up primarily of the demographic that this film portrays as selfish, manipulative, sadistic, and completely incapable of sincere thought or deed.  In many ways, this film is a hipster roach motel.  Oh, you say like Tim and Eric?  You love LCD Soundsystem?  You constantly retweet Neil Hamburger from your grandma's funeral?  Well come on into the theater, kids!  Now here, stare at this mirror for 90 minutes and look at just how fucking god awful you are.  The phrase, "bold choice," gets used quite a bit in film criticism, but here it seems appropriate.  In fact, the entirety of the films payload is at the millennial generation at large.   Any time I caught myself laughing was immediately followed by questioning if I was an awful human being.  Eric Warheim's slideshow towards the end of the film had me howling before I realized just how sad it was at the implied backstory.
           
I can't promise you will, as they say, enjoy watching the film.  What I can promise, if you have the patience to watch it, is an understated yet completely fearless performance by Heidecker.  Alverson is able to keep the plot relatively light, yet add just a few small touches that hint at a much larger backstory for these characters.  The score is minimal, yet able to keep the mood in a place bereft of comfort.  All the supporting roles are strong, especially the two main female roles by Kate Lyn Shell and Alexia Rasmussen.  Those two characters in particular are interesting because they allude more to Swanson's past and illustrate a possible future for him.  A future, that isn't necessarily promising. 

The COmedy is available on iTunes currently and is playing at select theaters right now.

817

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

I have a passionate love hate relationship with Troy.  Some pretty laughable choices in terms of dialogue, acting, plot choices, etc.  However the production design is breathtaking and I'm on record as being a huge fan of the fight scenes.  I'd love to DiF all over it.

818

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Sam, that's what I was referring to.  It wasn't baseless hope, I've heard numerour rumblings FROM apple and some 3rd party folk that they've got something in mind for next gen Mac Pro

819

(59 replies, posted in Off Topic)

The big question for me is what the new Mac PRO will look like.  By all indications, it is coming at some point, and those you can certainly upgrade video cards.  Im typing this on a souped up Mac G5 while running avid.  At the current place Im at, there are 45 stations just like this one.  Bunim Murray runs about 175 of the same station.  Authentic Productions in Burbank is about to switch over its 95 stations to the same.  So clearly there is still SOME small demand for them.

820

(22 replies, posted in Creations)

Paul, absolutely!  There's one page in particular I'm waiting for my artist to finish that you might like.  There's also the hero on stage during his weekly Q&A that I like quite a bit.  I'll email my artist now. 

Outside of that though, I may purchase 5 from you.  I'm decorating my office right now and these would go pretty awesome.

821

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I disagree.  In order for this particular story to work, the kid has to be a potential threat NOW.  Because it's not just a simple story of killing baby Hitler, where he grows up to be a threat.  He is a threat NOW and will therefore be a cataclysmic threat not just to Bruce Willis but to many in the future.  The kid has to be scary in the present, and the only way to make a 5 year old a legitimate threat is with something like the TK stuff.

822

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

This is part of a larger discussion that I'm sure we'll have, but the more I think about it, the more fluid I am on the rule of the second magic bean.  It just simply didn't matter to me AT ALL while I was watching this.  Does that make me a bad film watcher and a loser who's bad at life?  Maybe, but the storytelling was good in almost every direction that it failed to bother me.

823

(21 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Excellent!

824

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Dorkman wrote:


avatar wrote:

Personally, I don't see any difference between killing an innocent adult and an innocent child.

I agree. If Bruce Willis had murdered an adult who was clearly innocent of any crime, that would make him equally irredeemable.

When you kill an adult, you run the risk of the adult being able to fight back or somehow defend themselves or at least escape.  In killing a child you killing someone who is weaker both in terms of biology, but also psychology and has no benefit from experience.  Also, by and large, children of that age take a natural supplication towards adults which puts them at a clear disadvantage.  It's not like Bruce Willis slowly gassed them while they sleep, he faced one and gunned him down.  Not only is the child innocent, but completely outmatched and outgunned, and his last thought will be of a man whom he's never met ending his life.

THAT'S the difference.

825

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

bullet3 wrote:

And I don't even like kids.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4791735034670&set=a.1604517756230.2084137.1334721347&type=1

WELL I DON'T LIKE YOU EITHER!!!