876

(57 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

But how are Jackson's Hobbit films in any way "child-like"? They're attempting to be just as grim and mature as LOTR. And the violence in The Hobbit is far more gruesome than anything in LOTR. There's like a million beheadings on-screen in The Hobbit.

12 dwarves and Hobbit fall down a canyon, have a several thousand pound giant goblin fall on top of them with a satisfying thud, and the worst that happens is the audience laughs. 12 dwarves and a Hobbit are trapped in barrels going down a river, followed by an army of Orcs, and between a waves of groans from the audience PJ is forcing laugh moments. Entire armies fall to ruin by paper cuts.

It's trying to ride this line of dark and grim, but still trying to be "It's a story for kids yah!", but without actually wanting to face the consequences of what that actually means. I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that there's beheading every other second here, I'd say 90% of the fighting in these movies happens without bloodshed. Just slash your sword across their breastplate, they scream and fall down, "Oh the horrors of war." It wants to present the evils of mankind, so it has some asshole in a unibrow dress up in drag and be an asshole. It wants to be epic and grand, but nothing feels real, both in the sense that it's a literally an f-ing cartoon, but also in the fact that I, as someone watching this world, can't interact with or understand the motivations of barely anything going on. These guys do this cause... ehh, and those guys are doing this because- "Shut up and watch the over-saturated cartoons would yah?"


EDIT: Actually thinking about the Goblins again got me thinking, they're a pretty apt metaphor for what I'm trying to say.
Here are the Goblins in LOTR:

http://cdn.obsidianportal.com/assets/62147/goblins2.jpg

Terrifying, pointy bits everywhere, skin looks like it's rotting away in parts. Every part of the design is made to instill fear. These are scary mo-fo's.

Here are Goblins in the Hobbit:

http://siliconchickens.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/goblins04.jpg

They're bloated, confused, almost all of the points and edges have been filed away. The eyes are just bulging out of the skull like they didn't really know where to put them, and just squished them into the skin roughly where the eyes ought to be. It's all confused, and the result is something that...kiiiiindaaa.... resembles the terrifying visage we knew before, but ultimately is just kind of confusing, and at the end of the day just gets played for laughs anyways...cause "Hah, why would we want to make an enemy that's actually scary right guys? This is a kids movie!"

(And yes, whatever, you can argue it all away with they're a different species of Goblin, blah-blah-whatever-good-job-missing-the-point if you want to)

877

(57 replies, posted in Off Topic)

It does make more sense. I disagree completely and entirely with you. But I at least get where you're coming from.

878

(57 replies, posted in Off Topic)

fireproof78 wrote:

I would rather enjoy the films as a stand-alone work, rather than have constant reminders of another film series.

Fire, obviously we've talked about this a lot, you and I, but there's something I've never understood about this argument.

The way I understand things, The Hobbit book is, inside the text, a direct prequel to the Lord of The Rings, the characters have the same names, the places have the same names, the world is supposed to BE Middle-Earth. It's not some third party novel that they decided to appropriate into the Middle Earth canon. The Hobbit has always been and will always be a part of Middle Earth.

So to my ears, saying that you want to view the Hobbit as a stand alone work is like saying I'd like to view Harry Potter and the Sorcerers stone as a separate work from the rest of the novels. It doesn't make sense, it is as much a part of the series as the rest of them are.

The only real difference between the Hobbit and LOTR is the intended audience on Tolkeins part. But in terms of the actual story of Middle Earth, there is no difference between The Hobbit and LOTR. And that is only amplified even further when Peter Jackson makes his Hobbit movies and says "We are going to connect these movies to my LOTR trilogy.". He has specifically gone out of his way to nail it into our heads that THIS IS THE SAME SERIES, adding the whole Sauron thing, bringing back Ian Holm and Frodo. Directly tying the end of the Hobbit to the start of Fellowship. You can not watch these movies without being constantly slammed in the head with how much this is supposed to be the first part of this 6 movie universe.

So just then saying, "I choose to view it as a separate series", seems...no offense here....asinine.

879

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Fair enough I guess.

I'll keep listening when I have more time.

880

(10 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Herc wrote:

My friends asked their listeners which Christmas movie they wanted them to review, and the winner was The Muppet Christmas Carol. And I assure you, even if you don't think you're a fan of The Muppet Christmas Carol (or even if you hate it), I have absolutely no doubt that you'll consider listening to this as an hour well-spent. Trust me wink

Apparently someone needs to reorient my expectations on this. Cause I got about 12 minutes in and I have no flipping clue whats going on. As far as I can tell it's two guys spouting a constant stream of nonsense.

Um...help?

881

(24 replies, posted in Episodes)

bullet3 wrote:

Remember, it's not just purely about tech, it's how it's applied to convey an experience.


I haven't seen Interstellar yet, but holy shit this. Always this. ALWAYS FUCKING THIS.

Holden wrote:

Sorry, folks. Friends In Your Head Productions has pulled the release of Leroy due to a particular bit that may be offensive to Russians and/or members of the KGB.

http://www.lolroflmao.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Noooooooooo.jpg

http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/vader.jpg

http://ct.fra.bz/ol/fz/sw/i51/5/6/11/frabz-NOOOOOOOOO-46d6cd.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQd19G6p-aqfrJwZe5YCdGWsq4TQTeE86o1cSRmodnNoCPEvSy4FQ

https://38.media.tumblr.com/611541e22d788d4c5840c78fcb23233b/tumblr_narnh3lIYh1tdrceuo9_500.gif

I...I...I...don't...think...I can...believe you...

So you guys are just like saving this all up for a big Christmas present for us right?

Right?

And we'll only have to wait like another week.

Right?

RIGHT?!! PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS HOLY JUST SAY YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSS.

AAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

885

(19 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Ehkesoyo wrote:

Of course, this isn't enough to get a person to the highest level of any science.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I don't think that's what Herc is discussing here AT ALL. And also where I think you're misunderstanding him Paulou.

What I think Herc is asking about is exactly what Scishow and crash course is doing, getting people who wouldn't otherwise have an interest in some of these fields, because it's perceived as this dense impenetrable thing that only people who went to university to understand all the big words can understand, interested and curious about it, in a way that's accessible.

I don't think Herc is talking about replacing actual instructional material with this sort of work. If you are in a position where you are already interested and actively studying whatever it is, you are already outside the target demographic.

Speaking personally Scishow and Crash Course have done this repeatedly for me. I never really had any interest in chemistry, I tried it in High School and went NOOOPE. But I can sit down with Crash Course Chemistry and start to pick up some basics and a little bit of curiosity by watching a 10 minute video a week. And I leave knowing more than I did when I started the video. Am I ever going to become a master chemist? Hell no. Do I need to be in order to appreciate an understanding of a subject I otherwise wouldn't have explored because I felt like I would have had to be on the path to be a master chemist in order to get it? Hell fuckin no. And hey, if a couple people out there are like 'Hey, this chemistry stuff is actually kind of cool, I wanna know more about it." and that leads them down the path to becoming a master chemist. AWESOME.

Now, that said. Specifically to what you were asking Herc. For me personally, a video series like Crash Course or SciShow is much more likely to pique my interest than a laymens term paper would. It's just a much easier access point. HOWEVER if there was something on CC or SS that really interested me and I wanted to know more about, I might go seek out something like that. Because I'm in a position where I am curious about something, but I don't have the education to understand what's being said in the ordinal paper (or time to google every single word I'm reading and try to parse the understanding). So as a second level type thing it might be pretty cool.

And even as I'm writing that I'm thinking that if you started getting an archive of translated papers, I would totally just sit there and browse through looking for something that looked interesting and take a read.

So yah, take that for what you will. No clue if it helped tongue

886

(10 replies, posted in Episodes)

Morgan wrote:

I can't say anything for The Boxtrolls or The Book of Life as I didn't catch them in theaters. Feast is already on the shortlist for Animated Shorts, along with Glen Keane's Duet.

I haven't had the chance to see Boxtrolls yet either but it's really high up on my list atm, but I did see The Book of Life, and I would say it's definitely one of the better animated films of the last few years (and that's sayin something).

And if Feast doesn't win like ALL the awards, something is seriously wrong in the universe.

Squiggly_P wrote:

acrobats doing a Cirque Du Soleil act with glowsticks.

Oh but dude. You have no idea how hard I would watch the shit out of that show.

888

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

Spent the last couple days putting this together. Just a fun little machinima trailer thing for a livestream series I'm launching in the new year.

889

(7 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I once asked Fleur Delacour to the Yule Ball, don't mean she said yes.

890

(114 replies, posted in Creations)

The latest series of shorts I produced for Bullskit. Really really proud how these turned out. Managed to dip my toes back into some 3D stuff without completely losing my shit, so I'd call that a win.

891

(449 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Huh...that actually looks pretty freakin cool.

Although if you had asked me who I would cast as the new Sarah Connor, I would not have said Emilia Clarke. And...as much as I love her...she's really not right for this. She looks like she's about 16 and never seen a fight in her life. Unless they're REALLY fucking with the timeline, and she is actually super young (Although judging by the dialogue we did get it sounds like this is supposed to take place after T1, possibly even T2), I don't think she'll pull it off.

892

(17 replies, posted in Episodes)

Huh, weird to think all Hitler really needed for the whole PR thing was a bit of plastic surgery.


#Godwin'd

Tomahawk wrote:

I can't believe I'm actually getting into this, but:
The "exhausts" can't really be guards, as they have smaller emitters, that a potential blade could cut right through. If they were flush with the hilt, then I guess it could work.

I'll point you to one of the 16 dozen various possible explanations the internet (and abroad) has come up with in the past week, of why that's not the case.

Or my rant about 12 posts up...either works.

894

(670 replies, posted in Creations)

Been working on updating and building some new graphics for my various LP channels and projects.

Made this new outro as a quick little thing to throw at the end of my videos. Rather proud of how it turned out. (And featuring some music from our very own AuralStimulation big_smile)

EDIT: Apparently youtubes being stupid again, and won't recognize the embedded timecode. Just scroll to the end of the video if you want to check it out smile

895

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

To be fair, I have almost no clue what the hell he's on about either. And I read all the damn articles and apparently went to school for this shit so... *shrug*

Faldor wrote:

The first transport is away!

http://i.imgur.com/Rv7ZaVe.gif



(I spent a quite ridiculous amount of time trying to find this as a gif...gave up and made it myself...totally worth it)

897

(262 replies, posted in Episodes)

Faldor wrote:

15 year old murder  big_smile

Ah, the great case of the missing sock of 1999.

898

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

*breathes in*

*realizes this is probably a really bad idea considering the decade long blood war this has involved*

And how is that Paulou?

899

(538 replies, posted in Creations)

http://i.imgur.com/kwerH5F.gif

BBQ wrote:

I have no idea who created this, but someone needs to get this image in front of JJ Abrams -- stat.

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--R42P1UC1--/osa5qfgnk2ypcpn8vdl9.jpg

Gotta love the internet. They have 20 frames of a new thing, and they already don't trust JJ enough to explain it to us or make it work.

I read a thing the other day where someone went down the line and listed every known material in the EU (As it stood before Disney) that was impervious to lightsabers. List was like 20-30 materials long.  And clearly it's not any of those that they are incorporating into canon, or hell, any of the other hundred legitimate sounding reasons fans have come up with in the last few days to explain why it would work.

No, clearly JJ is wrong about his own movie and based on the 20 frames we have of this new thing we know better.

Oh internet.