976

(23 replies, posted in Episodes)

Yeah, the black and white version that's on the original DVD, complete with Oz's commentary, was just all the unfinished puppet shots strung together to the song. We didn't even get the running crowds, so that's new smile

As far as your reaction, I think this is a difference between movies and the stage. I'm going to assume, never having seen a local production, that it ends with the entire cast of dead characters coming onto the stage to sing the end song. Sweeney Todd is the same way. This gives you an entirely different vibe than what a movie will give you. So, a combination of that, and Oz maybe taking the ending a bit too seriously. I can see him going, "OK, they wouldn't let Henson go REALLY dark with his stuff, and God knows he wants to, so I'm going to go dark with this."

I may have mentioned it in some other thread, but as a kid I thought Alien and Outland were in the same movie universe. It helped that both novelizations were written by Alan Dean Foster, but there was the same theme of evil space corporations uniting them. The idea of a series of movies, all independent but in the same "world", was great.

978

(30 replies, posted in Episodes)

The DVD has a commentary with the director and editor. The director is French. That's about all I got from the four minutes of it I listened to. Well, that and the fact they were editing up until two weeks before release, about the time the commentary was recorded.

979

(3 replies, posted in Creations)

Even the best scripts have had a plot hole or two, although to be fair often it was for practical reasons.

Squiggly_P wrote:

There is so much about this movie that I want to bring up that it's hard to choose just a few things to write about. I'll start with the DVD cover. The movie is The Wizard Of Oz, only really really shitty and instead of having a tin man and a scarecrow you have generic characters named Faith, Hope and - inexplicably - Turtle. No, I don't get that one, either.

It's Turtles all the way up to Heaven, dude.

981

(64 replies, posted in Off Topic)

For those who actually know their Bond films, how would the Dalton films have done if Brosnan had been in them? For those who don't know (and I might not know, being old and forgetful), Brosnan was in line to play the part but NBC refused to let him out of his Remmington Steel contract. Never bothered seeing the Dalton films, but recall the first Remmington Steel episode after it all went down had Brosnan looking not happy to be there.

982

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

Just do a search and replace in all the old Mapquest jokes.

avatar wrote:

5. Why did the Engineer not talk? In a longer deleted scene, he did talk. But it was felt during editing that speaking removed his god-like aura. Apparently making him go 'aaaaaaah' and act like a WWF wrestler is more god-like. Idiots.

Well, it's going to depend on the god, isn't it smile

It is bizarre when the creator of something seems to know less or care less than the fans. I remember watching a quizz show where the topic was the career of Alice Cooper. One of the contestants was an Alice Cooper fan, and the other contestant was... Alice Cooper. And the fan did better.

Don't see why that's bizarre. Who's going to know more about your life, you, who has stuff to do, or a stalker who has memorized your entire family tree and what you had for dinner for the past eight years?

984

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

The whole cell phone thing came up at the time of release, and the excuse was used that there just wasn't coverage there. I agree, there are ways to use cell phones creatively. Hell, being too dependent on technology should be a failing. (A character in a current story of mine is screwed when she'd whisked off into space because everything on her phone was on the cloud, so she's left with no music or books, no photos of family, etc).

I will just point out this is the second time a post of mine was mentioned in an episode, yet my name was forgotten. Oh, woe is me! smile

985

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

Cannibal Holocaust is only partly found footage, though. There are others, but I think most are obscure enough that really nobody (including the creators of Blair Witch) saw them.

986

(51 replies, posted in Episodes)

What I love is that at heart, it's live action roleplaying. You have the director acting as Dungeon Master, setting up encounters for the players. No other movie, I don't think, has tried it this way, where the actors seriously don't know what the fuck is coming next.

987

(91 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Maybe the writer had two scripts, one with no last act and another with no first act smile

988

(11 replies, posted in Episodes)

Years ago, I was sent a packet to write down what I listened to on the radio. The letter included a dollar bill as payment. I never bothered, and not long after I got another letter... asking for the dollar back.

989

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

They've already talked about Cabin in the Woods, so I'd rather they wait and not have the film take up one of these spots. There are movies they're only going to ever do as part of an October run, so let's get those out of the way before doing one they're guaranteed to get to eventually.

990

(9 replies, posted in Off Topic)

I question their data smile Almost all animation were shorts, so are probably counted twice. No shorts are shown in theaters, so I'm not sure what the hell the bottom of the graph is actually counting for the past 40 years. And porn since the 80's is all direct to video. Context, we need context!

Lamer wrote:
Invid wrote:

Great job adapting the comic, knowing what to keep and what to drop. I was very impressed by how the lack of narration, key to the comic but hard to pull off in a film, was replaced with wordless visuals and just the occasional dialog to get plot details across

That's the only thing I didn't like about it. Not everything can be replaced by visuals and once you've decided to drop the narration you can't use any of it by having Batman muttering to himself mid-action. It's really cool to be in Batman's head. Especially when Batman is older, crankier and a little more insane than usual.

I think they decided, rightly imho, that the narration was part of the problem with Year One. It just doesn't work on film. I agree, you miss most of the best lines, but you're left with a movie that flows well and tells the story. It's the kind of tradeoff you have to do when going from the page to the screen.

I'm tempted to write a review, but for now, I'll just say the new animated adaptation of The Dark Knight Returns is everything Year One wasn't. Great job adapting the comic, knowing what to keep and what to drop. I was very impressed by how the lack of narration, key to the comic but hard to pull off in a film, was replaced with wordless visuals and just the occasional dialog to get plot details across. Splitting it into two parts was also the right thing to do, giving the whole thing room to breath.

Buy it smile

993

(77 replies, posted in Episodes)

Eddie wrote:

BTW, I'm not the exception, either.  Most editors I know have families and are able to strike the balance.  Much better than I am, it seems sometimes.

So, editors get the girl. Good to know!

994

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

dodgson wrote:

Why you don't like this masterpiece and all-around beloved horror classic, Teague?

There is nothing wrong with not liking a film considered a classic. I mean, hell, it's a low budget film in a genre he may not like that has been ripped off to death. It's also slow, very slow. Either you go with it, or you don't. Hell, maybe the problem is he went from The Thing to Halloween, and not the other way around.

Think of him as a force of nature, or bureaucracy. Or the monster smile

On the other hand, you perhaps expect the movie to do something the opposite of what it intended. Always the problem when a 30+ year old franchise is exported. If the movie in fact doesn't give Dredd an arc, they're at least being true to what I remember of the source material. Dredd is a there for other characters to react to, not to react.

997

(2,061 replies, posted in Episodes)

Well, Salem's Lot is one of those all you young kids have ONLY seen on video, so don't remember it started on TV.

I too vote for at least one Carpenter title. Prince of Darkness is my favorite, due to the subject matter (what if God, the real one, was on the anti-matter side of things and thus "evil"?). Blair Witch would be a good one to go into how editing can create a movie out of nothing. Elm Street, yes, please, it needs to be done.

I'd toss in one classic, The Haunting, an incredible example of what you can do without actually showing anything, and in fact leaving open the possibility that NOTHING is in fact happening.

At some point you guys should do a J-Horror film, and The Ring is as good as any to stand for the entire genre.

As for Twilight Zone... This would be a Trey special, I assume smile

998

(26 replies, posted in Episodes)

I'm sure the scripts for all five seasons are done, just like those final six Star Wars scripts were just sitting on a shelf smile

999

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

Doctor Submarine wrote:

I keep hearing the word "Valeyard" getting tossed around...

Are they? I don't get the new episodes, but like I said if they're tying this in with the 6th Doctor I will be VERY impressed smile

1,000

(991 replies, posted in Off Topic)

If we suddenly see this Doctor's adventures being watched by the the 6th Doctor at his trial, I will seriously consider worshiping the current creative team smile