Topic: Great graph.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

I question their data smile Almost all animation were shorts, so are probably counted twice. No shorts are shown in theaters, so I'm not sure what the hell the bottom of the graph is actually counting for the past 40 years. And porn since the 80's is all direct to video. Context, we need context!

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

4 (edited by oTom 2012-09-26 07:41:33)

Re: Great graph.

Thumbs up +1 Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

Re: Great graph.

Zarban is Reddit in disguise.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

I'm often related to as IMDb. These things happen.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

Also, short is a form, not a genre. There are short comedies, short documentaries, and short porn films. Percentages are also a problematic way to show this data, since an expansion of one type in this chart implies a contraction in another, which may or may not be the case, we simply don't know.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

Thumbs up Thumbs down

Re: Great graph.

Thumbs up Thumbs down