Re: #44 - Disney Buys Lucasfilm
You make an interesting analogy and your point is well said.
Civil discourse on the internet? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.
It may be that GL is no longer the Pope of Star Wars (insert random Space Pope joke here) but that does not change his view on canon, that to him, the movies and what he does are it, but the EU and other books are there and that's great, but they do not affect him.
I agree, but the question is whether we imbue his view with any special significance.
In all honesty, if GL were writing the sequels to the OT Luke would not be married, the Emperor doesn't come back and much of what happens in many beloved books is simply going to be in books. That's not my words-it was from an interview GL did.
Again the issue is whether we think GL's view matters.
So, while SW canon is subjective for the fans, the material used for movies is up to Lucasfilm. They are not bound by EU at all.
Well, what's at stake here is intellectual property laws. LF own the rights to the IP, and so have the ability to make more of it. Barring fan films and obscure jurisdictions that don't recognize US IP laws, they have a monopoly for as long as Disney can continue to buy Congress. That's not quite the same as the ability to decide what is Canon.
To further your church analogy a little bit, while Protestants do not recognize the same canon as Catholics or the authority of the Pope, most Protestant denominations have a common thread of "sola Scriptura" scripture alone as their canon. There are disagreements about some traditions and other interpretations, but the authority of canon is usually consistent.
If I may, I'm not sure that 'sola sciptura' refers to the idea of only scripture being canon, so much as the idea that scripture contains everything that you need to know for salvation. There are groups who subscribe to 'sola scripture' who have different scriptures.
Regardless, the issue is not so much whether they have different canons, but their view of how canon is defined. Is it defined by authority, or by individual conscience?
So, I regard the OT and PT as "canon" with other things being up for interpretation and Lucasfilm being able to decide what ultimately is movie material.
Again the important question is not what you believe , so much as why you believe it. I presume you believe that the six are canon because GL says they are? Does that mean that whoever owns LF can decide to change that in the future, or does GL remain the Pope of Star Wars? If the Papacy follows the money, what if LF doesn't even recognize the concept of canon, or if they declare the Ewok Movie and the Christmas Special canon?
Last edited by TheGreg (2012-11-11 06:49:29)