Re: Last movie you watched
Escape Plan (2013) - 6/10
Stallone and Schwarzenegger try to escape from prison.
This movie feels like a pretty standard thriller, part modern thriller sensibilities (think the Guy Pearce movie "Lockout"), and part throwback action movie structure since the veterans are in it.
Truth be told, this movie firmly held my interest. I mean, it's shot, edited and produced like any modern thriller, but the story is actually engaging, the one-liners for me avoided the "wink-wink" cringe territory. You know how in The Expendables movies whenever they would stop the action for a second for the "tagline" moments for each actor? Part of you were like "ok, they got that in there, nice" and part of you was just slightly cringing at how forced it always is? Well, this movie at one point has Arnold grabbing a machine gun and going to town, and rather than going "Ehh, see what we did there? ...Ehh?", the movie sort of builds up to it. You see Arnold moving, and you see the machine gun, and the movie allows you to think "oh... I wonder if he can get to that...". It sort of builds up your anticipation for a second rather than just blatantly _doing it_. And once it happens, I won't lie, I got a grin from ear to ear. Partly because of the inherent fan service, but mostly just because it was kind of glorious. Close up of the eyes, slow motion, helicopter blades wooshing past.
The bad guy who runs the prison is great, it's Jim Caviezel btw. He perfectly balances the "we need a quirky colorful villain because Die Hard! so give him a bunch of weird hobbys and ticks" aspect which is there, but he's also subdued and also just a bit weird and a douche, basically. He doesn't become rabbit-petting Bond-villainy at any point. I really enjoyed him.
Directed by Michael Håfström who is a fellow Swede. The movie has a 6.9 on IMDb so generally the reception to it has been very warm, I'd never heard of it myself.
I'd give this a very strong recommendation actually. Story on paper is standard, production is what you'd expect cinematography and music-wise for a modern middle-of-the-road thriller, but to me it is firmly planted on the good side of the spectrum, it was engaging, pretty hard to predict (though after it's over you can count the references to 90s action films). Arnold speaks German for a portion and it's cool hearing him deliver natural dialogue.
After Earth (2013) - 4/10
(get used to these expressions, they don't change for the entire film... Ambien is a hell of a drug).
Not at all horrible. But completely lifeless and dull, like they purposefully made a movie that is as uncinematic as possible, that doesn't translate, captivate or engage an inch beyond whatever medium was used to capture the images.
They could have told the story in 15 minutes, it's just a single storyline, A > B > C > The End. Jaden Smith is not good in this movie. I watched it after a long day at work so I was semi-comatose, and that's the energy level you need to get through it.
Muddled messages. Scene: Watch out for nature, it's trying to kill you at every turn! Next scene: Look at the beautiful nature! No real point or definition to anything, like if a good movie took an ambien that now just slurs it's words. Obligatory bossfight at the end has no tension or suspense. Not worth it at all.
(I saw that the youtube channel "Your Movie Sucks" has posted part 1 of a breakdown of it. Will probably be hilarious and informative even if you haven't watched the film: http://www.youtube.com/user/YourMovieSucksDOTorg (lots of awesome breakdowns of movies, Plinkett style, and similar style and sensibilities).
Riddick (2013) - 5/10
Nice seeing the character again. Good world-building. But the story is basically the first film all over again. Feels a bit too Green-screeny. Didn't bore me, but the script isn't strong at all. Too many cliches and not violent enough to grab your attention.
If you like the character it might be worth it, but you could give it a miss.
The Bourne Identity (1988) - 5/10
The original Richard Chamberlain Mini Series. Overall very dated. Unless you want to specifically get a different point of view of the material compared to the Doug Liman film, skip it. It's from the 80s, feels like it's from the 70s.
Superman (1978) - 7/10
Watched it fully engaged for the first time in a long time. Overall great, some ideas or plot structures have not aged too well but some beats are still used in similar movies today which is interesting.
Christopher Reeve rules. That is all.
Hard Rain (1998) - 6/10
Hadn't seen this 90s action-thriller before. Directed by Mikael Salomon, who previous had been DP on The Abyss (cause water?). Slater needs to stop people robbing his money transport during a huge rain storm.
Impressive logistically and pretty grand in scale, it starts like an Emmerich film where you can see the obvious writing as the characters are introduced and given quick personalities and small one-liners to try and establish some definition.
I was luke-warm in the first 20 minutes or so, but the longer it went, the better it got. What starts out feeling kind of cheap expands more and more until finally you have whole houses with the actors in the being ripped away by the storm and floating around, and the movie becomes more of a straight actioner. Feels John Woo, in the Broken Arrow era, which is very 90s, but also kind of endearing.
Some cool miniature stuff, some spectacular matte paintings breaking some records according to trivia.
If you haven't seen it it will probably be a pretty cool addition to the 90s action library. Just give it time to move past the clunky character work and there's some good stuff here.
Red 2 (2013) - 5/10
I already kind of forgot it. Not bad, but it feels like an unnecessary continuation of the first film. The first film is just enough of charm and quirk to be good, and I'm not sure I needed more of it. Plus no Karl Urban is, I think we can all agree, a terrible omission.