Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
Citizen Kane
The Wizard of Oz
Unforgiven
Batman Returns
My Favorite Martian
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by paulou
Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
Citizen Kane
The Wizard of Oz
Unforgiven
Batman Returns
My Favorite Martian
Bummed this was so conversion centric, seeing as the industry has almost universally decided that native 3D is the way it should be done.
Damn right it comes in pints.
(not a mathmatect)
Like empirically or at the time? I was like 13 and on a mountain in Japan I shot some bottle rockets into a tree full of wild monkeys. Which I thought was super awesome at the time but now I think it was just mean.
To be fair though, the elementary school had to close earlier that day due to monkeys (throwing poops etc) so I felt like I was avenging their education.
Most unusual breakup?
I would argue it had body switching, but wasn't a body switch movie.
And if we're fucking things, fuck Inception.
Got it today! Watched the film and the available commentary back to back. Got kind of drunk at the goading of the nice letter that came with the disc and repeated suggestion of the commentarians so will have to be brief for now. But fucking bravo everyone, really really enjoyed it.
Indie films need to be more this way.
Tried watching this yesterday, got about to where the guy said something like, "Faces are important" and couldn't fucking take it anymore.
It's like Christmas!
…
Oh.
You need to see two real doctors and one fake one.
Impression is a weird metric to use when judging a movie.
The science behind ratings is all eyes per ad minute, and it's forced into being a proper and good system due to all of the business reasons mentioned. However! Does CPM or the value of the perceived audience ever factor into the worth of a show in any significant amount?
The way something like a yachting magazine can take out Rolex ads for crazy money because the minuscule audience is more likely to buy one than an average human. Might be screwing up my metaphor. Or this question is just an exercise in pretentious asshole exceptionalism, and we're all just sheep that buy what the flashy box tells us.
Considering fxphd's been accepting pitches for their next short from members, who will then all work together to make it, I'd say everything in that list of trade offs is actually present.
I suppose there's a value in physicality, though. Like the Pixar bathroom thing. Where the main bank of bathrooms is in the middle of their main building so people that otherwise wouldn't run into each other are prone to meeting up, discussing problems, and collaborating.
Mac/Linux towers at work. Lots of cores, lots of ram.
2008 Macbook Pro at home. With quick external eSata drives I've been pleasantly surprised how well it has been holding up, especially for little production things. I've been comping this little promo for a friend's cycling crew the last couple weeks. Every shot is a vfx shot, ~70 secs long, lots of layers, HD, and Nuke has been mostly usable. A little crashy, but fine for this.
I'm not an expert in the tech and only follow it a little, but I think there's a future for stuff like GPU acceleration to be done through Thunderbolt accessories once it goes fiber optic, making laptops even more sensible production machines than they are now.
There's always work being done on the outskirts of what is technologically capable, like complex simulation, rendering work, Flame/Smoke boxes, but all that is available on Linux anyway.
To answer your question, you need to define "capable". This little promo is just me making something for a friend. If it was a real job with money and deadlines behind it, it wouldn't be an acceptable machine. You pay that premium on the high end desktop machines for the agility, and right now laptops are still incapable of that kind of performance.
Why is this Full Sail place so heavily represented here? Just curious.
Oh, and non-traditional places like fxphd can't go unmentioned, especially when talking about practical film education and visual effects production. Like a year after just doing those classes in my free time I was running circles around people that ostensibly paid for a traditional education in the same subjects.
Important to remember that they aren't mutually exclusive endeavors. A professor I had recommended working for five years in a field, and then pursuing grad school in that field only if you feel limited by your lack of higher education or compelled into years of expensive and heavy research.
Alternately, you can do something so cool and impressive with that time that you end up with a scholarship or something. At the very least enough field experience to really get something out of it.
They will stop when they stop making money. *
* They won't ever stop making money.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by paulou
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.