He's kidding. And it gave me a good chuckle, Squigs! +1
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Writhyn
He's kidding. And it gave me a good chuckle, Squigs! +1
Chirrut believes in the Force. Baze doesn't. Chirrut's example brought Baze around. It's a small arc but it's there, and it's not shabby in the emotional payoff when it happens.
I couldn't disagree more on the characters. I thought each one had a good motivation and a good arc. But that's me.
Jacklyn Peppermire receives an anonymous payment with instructions to kill the infamous "Baron," a corporate banker and mayor of a town in Switzerland, who has a habit of making his political enemies disappear.
Baron is a retired master assassin himself, so Pepperjack has to approach the whole situation with extreme caution, as many others have tried to kill this guy, with no success. He's just too good.
After scoping out the town, Pepperjack makes her first attempt...which goes wrong when Baron reveals he'd known about her being hired to kill him.
Barely escaping with her life, Pepperjack has to call it quits to save herself, but when all her special and secret accounts are drained of funds, she knows the banker Baron is behind it, and goes back to kill him to get her money.
After pulling off a particularly unorthodox plan, she finds herself face-to-face with Baron. An epic fight ensues, but the older assassin's age has finally caught up to him, and Pepperjack beats him. When she demands to know how to retrieve her money, Baron reveals that he was the one who hired her! He'd been hating himself for his past crimes for years, but couldn't stand to kill himself. So he'd been hiring other great assassins to kill him, but all had failed until Pepperjack.
He congratulates her, smiling mysteriously and saying, "I knew you'd be the one to succeed," and dies. She's frustrated when the Swiss army arrives and forces her to escape before recovering her money.
Later, Jacklyn Peppermire receives a letter saying that Georg von Krenn, mayor of a town in Switzerland, had been murdered, but his will had stipulated all his assets should go to her.
As much fun as the two guys were having, I thought Danielle Nicolet (Hart's character's wife) was great in it. She played a great character, especially during the couple therapy session.
I think the only thing that kept it from being a solid fun movie for me was Johnson's dumb act. It was fine until his full intentions were revealed, but then it played completely wrong. If his character had been just acting the ditz, fine, but afterward we should've seen him sober up a bit. Funny as it is to say, I think johnson is too smart to play dumb very well. Maybe it just didn't work for this movie, though.
What brought you to Friends in Your Head?
+5 points for the exact length of the vid being 1234
I love, love, love my XPS 13
I'm game, though I've been brainstorming on this in the meantime and it's quite a different beast.
Agreed.
In fact, on another level, Passion of the Christ bugged me for that reason.
I mean, sure, the process of flogging and crucifixion was brutal, but the movie made it seem like the physical suffering was the point. Like LOOK AT THIS! DOESN'T THAT SUCK? DON'T YOU LOVE JESUS!!!???
Sure dude, but the physical violence wasn't 1% of what the suffering was, so stop it.
Anywho, I agree with Praxus, if for slightly different reasons.
On the subject of Weasley actors, how about the guys who played Fred and George? I think they "fit" the doctor a little bit better, and you could do a lot of fun things with two guys who look the same.
Get twice as much principle photography done in the same time, too ;P
I've created a discord server specifically for the Hyacinth project. Boter and BDA are already on it. Awaiting Teague. https://discord.gg/6JzAfh2
Anyone who wants to keep an eye on things or give feedback is welcome to check it out. Just keep it Hyacinth-related: as always, feedback is welcome, ideas are welcome.
I'll be posting some planning stuff, and it's got individual character channels to discuss more detailed things if necessary. I'd like to try and set up a cast meeting at some point to try and meet each other (for Mrs. Writhyn and my sister's benefit, mainly) and to get a feel for how we all talk. Post in discord what times work for you.
That is so great
Episode List (Sorry, Boter):
1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GU4 … sp=sharing
2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lf3 … sp=sharing
3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TzZ … sp=sharing
4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IKr … sp=sharing
5: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O4t … sp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kL8 … sp=sharing
Here's a link to what the hell's going on with this story and its characters. There's a lot of stuff in here that isn't (and doesn't need to be) in the script itself, but it should help put faces and context on everything.
Holy carp. That's exactly correct.
There's some backstory to each character that doesn't need to be in the script, and some personality info that will feed the acting, but this is each character in a nutshell.
Also fun fact: every person except Con and Finch (my wife and I are playing them) and Ember was written gender neutral until they were cast. Blue, Grimm, Argus, Dreadnought, Temple and Station were all open to a quick pronoun change depending on the cast.
Honestly I'm just delighted as hell that anyone besides me is excited to put more than 2-minutes effort into this. Anything else I can do to help ye honeste volunteers, lemme know.
No worries, I gotcha
I'll take this evening and write up a couple pages of a clear Dramatis Personae and setting info. I have a rough document for my own reference, but I can see how having almost pure dialogue would be damned confusing.
Wow. Listened to the DiF on this one again, and this time I read through these posts....
Fun times. I clearly missed some of the more contentious ages of this community.
One thing that nobody in the discussion (DiF or forum) talks about is how wrong everyone was about Nero's motivations: he explicitly tells them to Pike while torturing him, and it makes sense.
Nero tells pike about how torn up he is that his family died, and then he got wormholed back in time. Pike tells him Romulus is still there. Nero screams at him because "I saw it happen!"
I understand this might be where the confusion comes from, but I see it as 1) an emotional outburst which even normal people have, and 2) even though Nero KNOWS that Romulus is fine in this timeline, he STILL WILL NEVER SEE HIS FAMILY again, since they're a century in his future now. From his (reasonable) perspective, his beloved wife and child are dead. THIS is why he wants to hurt Spock Prime (sure, Spock was trying, but again, Nero is allowed a little senseless rage).
So that explains his emotional moment there.
More importantly, what follows is Nero's self-explanation: he knows he now has a century to save Romulus. He's not concerned about that. He's torturing Pike so he can get the codes to shutdown federation defenses or whatever. Why?
"To create a new future for Romulus, one free from the Federation."
That's it. Right there. Literally in the movie. Even aside from Romulus Prime blowing up, the Romulans and Federation have mostly hated each other, and Nero has decided to kill everyone so that his home Empire will be able to expand unchecked into the next century. This (while definitely a bit megalomaniacal) is a perfectly good motive for everything Nero does as a villain. After he blows up Vulcan (to punish Spock Prime AND to remove Romulus' enemy) he goes to earth to do the same thing. Nero has a century to save Romulus, and he's going to change its future into a Glorious, unopposed Empire "free of the Federation."
TL;DR I think Brian's main story critique (and the other guys agreed on this point mostly) is actually groundless. The villain's motivation is totally explained, by the guy, in the movie, clearly: he has all the time in the galaxy to save Romulus, but he's going even further, freeing it from the Federation so the Romulan Empire can grow unchecked in the new timeline.
So, production starts next week! There's still room for editing the script, but I have to get my sister in to record before she heads to South Africa, or wait for six months. So, gotta finish the script polish soon.
It's not DONE done, but this is the best I can get the script without some meaty feedback. I need fresh eyes.
Here's a link, for anyone interested in helping out:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GU4 … sp=sharing
A link to the next episode is at the bottom of each document.
I appreciate any feedback. Detailed, general, or whatever: this project needs to be good, and criticism is necessary to achieve that. So gimme both barrels. I can take it. (One distinction: if you have a question, feel free to ask, but clarify whether you're just curious or if you think that question NEEDS to be answered in the script)
I would especially appreciate feedback from anyone slotted to actually record a character: Boter, BDA, and Teague. I know you're all busy, so no pressure, but if you can make notes, I'd appreciate it. (Also, feel free to back out on the recording if you have to. I'll figure out new actors:)
Contrary to Teague's nefarious accusations, I DO hate being that guy. I only said something because you said the graphic had something to do with your short film, and I'd hate for you to get flak from THE INTERNETS. It's like when you've got broccoli in your teeth: it's awkward, but a good friend tells you.
I hate to be that guy, but......*badasses
the whole movie should have been the third act. Start the movie with the Rebels deciding all is lost, and then one ship of wacky misfits says fuck it, there's one thing that might work and we're gonna try for it. What little back story we needed could have been covered on the flight over - guess what, my dad designed the death star and it's got a weakness, if we can just get hold of the plans. And off we go.
...Because once they set out on the REAL mission, Rogue One is actually pretty darn good, and of course I LOVE that every blessed one of 'em died. That was awesome. But that first hour... yeeesh.
This isn't the first time I've heard this, but I disagree. I thought the first "hour" was great for developing the characters and establishing motivations. And sure WE know what the Death Star can do, but it was really cool to see the characters reacting to even its low-power operation. For me, it made the Death Star (after 3 movies with a variant) more imposing and "real" than ever before.
But that's me. I'm more interested in hearing from Trey or anyone who agrees with him (because I'm genuinely curious): what makes the first "hour" of this movie different from the character setup from, say Star Wars '77? Couldn't that movie have started with the Alliance looking up and there's the Death Star over their secret base? Or maybe with a ship of misfits showing up at the Death Star to rescue the princess after the Tantive IV opening? Do we really need to know why a Jedi hermit, a farmboy, a scruffy smuggler, and his pet human show up to help?
I liked the setup of Rogue One, and it's fine if we disagree, but what makes it less important than the setup of Star Wars or any other movie? (since we're probably not getting a DiF discussion anytime soon)
That's funny! I thought exactly the same thing. His quip was fine, but it would have been cooler if he didn't even bother turning around at all. Just turn his back and keep it turned...although, I'm a firm advocate that Vader's first scene was kinda pointless and that it would have been better if he'd only shown up at Scarif.
Also, maybe his armor and helmet was poorly done because Krennic showed up and Vader was like "Aw crap hurry!" and didn't have time to get the look perfect before his grand entrance ;P
Friends In Your Head | Forums → Posts by Writhyn
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 9 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.